Implement a Waiting Period for Paid Vacation in California? Yes You Can.
California employers know they must compensate any employee unused and vested vacation pay upon separation from employment. Once vacation is vested, the right to vacation pay cannot be forfeited. But what happens when vacation rights have not vested? The Court of Appeals recently decided this question in Minnick v. Automotive Creations, Inc.
In Minnick, the employer terminated an employee after six months of employment. Per the employer’s written vacation policy, which mandated a waiting period to accrue vacation, no vacation pay was paid at the time of termination. The employer’s policy noted that after one year of service, the employee could take one week vacation, and after two years of service, the employee would accrue two weeks paid vacation per year. Plaintiff argued this policy was in conflict with the law that vacation pay cannot be forfeited. However, the Minnick court rejected that argument, holding that if an employer has a clear policy, it has every right not to provide paid vacation only after a specified waiting period. In fact, an employer has the right to not have a paid vacation policy at all. Because the employer’s policy clearly stated that the employee must be employed for one year before any paid vacation could be taken, the employer did not violate California law by not paying out any vacation at the time of termination.
The key in this case was the employer’s policy. As such, it illustrates the importance of maintaining a current and well-written employee handbook, work rules, and policies. If you have questions about this blog or about your Employee Handbook, please contact your attorney or reach out to Mellissa Schafer or any Hinshaw Labor & Employment attorney. Mellissa and others at Hinshaw regularly review and audit employee handbooks for their clients.
Featured Insights

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
May 21, 2026
Deploying AI Companions in Elder Care: A Privacy Compliance Playbook

Press Release
May 20, 2026
Hinshaw Releases America 250 Book Exploring Insurance's Role in Building the United States

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 19, 2026
OCC's Final Escrow-Interest Preemption Rules Bolster the Second Circuit’s Cantero Decision

Webinar
May 19, 2026
Scott Seaman Speaks on Making Decisions in Difficult Risk Environments

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 14, 2026
Key Takeaways from the 2026 MBA Legal Issues and Regulatory Compliance Conference

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 14, 2026
SCOTUS Confirms: Federal Courts Retain Power to Affirm or Vacate an Arbitration Decision

In The News
May 13, 2026
Hinshaw Contributes Chapters to “Wrongful-Death and Survival Actions” IICLE Handbook

In The News
May 12, 2026
Hinshaw GC Steve Puiszis Discusses Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in an AI Age

Event
May 12-13, 2026
Mitchel Chargo Speaks on the Rapidly Evolving Cannabis Industry

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 11, 2026
Tennessee Reaches Settlement with Mariner in Multistate UDAAP Enforcement Action

Press Release
May 11, 2026
Ali Degan Elected to the Fellows of the American Bar Foundation

