Implement a Waiting Period for Paid Vacation in California? Yes You Can.
California employers know they must compensate any employee unused and vested vacation pay upon separation from employment. Once vacation is vested, the right to vacation pay cannot be forfeited. But what happens when vacation rights have not vested? The Court of Appeals recently decided this question in Minnick v. Automotive Creations, Inc.
In Minnick, the employer terminated an employee after six months of employment. Per the employer’s written vacation policy, which mandated a waiting period to accrue vacation, no vacation pay was paid at the time of termination. The employer’s policy noted that after one year of service, the employee could take one week vacation, and after two years of service, the employee would accrue two weeks paid vacation per year. Plaintiff argued this policy was in conflict with the law that vacation pay cannot be forfeited. However, the Minnick court rejected that argument, holding that if an employer has a clear policy, it has every right not to provide paid vacation only after a specified waiting period. In fact, an employer has the right to not have a paid vacation policy at all. Because the employer’s policy clearly stated that the employee must be employed for one year before any paid vacation could be taken, the employer did not violate California law by not paying out any vacation at the time of termination.
The key in this case was the employer’s policy. As such, it illustrates the importance of maintaining a current and well-written employee handbook, work rules, and policies. If you have questions about this blog or about your Employee Handbook, please contact your attorney or reach out to Mellissa Schafer or any Hinshaw Labor & Employment attorney. Mellissa and others at Hinshaw regularly review and audit employee handbooks for their clients.
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

