Hinshaw's 12 Days of California Labor & Employment Series – Day 7: Rest Break Updates
In the spirit of the season—and keeping some semblance of normal—we are using our annual "12 days of the holidays" blog series to address new California laws and their impact on California employers. On this seventh day of the holidays, my labor and employment attorney gave to me: seven swans a-swimming and AB 1512 and AB 2479.
Due to the multitude of wage and hour claims that are filed each year, meal and rest break updates are consistently part of annual employment law changes. Generally, an employer must provide and permit an uninterrupted rest break for all nonexempt employees who work at least 3.5 hours. Rest breaks must be offered at the rate of 10 minutes for every four hours worked. In Augustus v. ABM Security Services, Inc., the California Supreme Court held that employers must relieve employees of all duties during the rest breaks and relinquish any control over how employees spend their rest break.
AB 1512: Rest Periods for Security Officers
There are certain jobs where it can be difficult, or unsafe, to completely relieve an employee of all duties during rest break. As of January 1, 2021, AB 1512 will provide an exception from the Augustus case for qualifying security officers or guards. 
Notably, AB 1512 has specific requirements as to who it applies to, as it does not apply to every security officer or guard. It only applies to security officers who, pursuant to the Private Security Services Act, are employed by a private patrol operator registered pursuant to the Private Security Services Act, and who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. At this time, AB 1512 has a sunset date of January 1, 2027.
AB 2479: Rest Periods for Safety-Sensitive Positions at Petroleum Facilities
In addition, California passed AB 2479. Previously, an exception was instituted for union represented employees who hold a safety-sensitive position at a petroleum facility to be relieved of all duties during a rest break. This exception was set to expire as of January 1, 2021. Under AB 2479, it has now been extended through January 1, 2026.
Similar to AB 1512, AB 2479 provides specificities for who the exemption applies to. It also defines petroleum facilities and safety-sensitive positions.
What Employers Need to Know
Despite Augustus, security officers or guards, as well as petroleum facility workers holding a safety-sensitive position, may be required to handle emergency and/or safety issues during a rest break. They can also be required to stay on the premises during a rest break and required to carry communication devices on their rest break.
For employers in these two specific areas, handbook amendments should be completed. In addition, it would be a best practice to ensure that your human resources team is not only aware of these changes, but able to advise and train the specific employees of the requirements and steps to handle a rest break if it does, in fact, get interrupted.
Finally, if an employer fails to or is unable to provide a rest break, it is required that the employer pay the employee one hour of pay at their regular rate in the next paycheck.
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology
