Evans Vows to Take Sexual Orientation Discrimination Case to the U.S. Supreme Court
2 min read
Jul 7, 2017
The Supreme Court may soon answer the most significant question to arise under Title VII in recent years: is sexual orientation discrimination "sex discrimination" within the meaning of the statute? The case to watch: Evans v. Georgia Regional Hospital.
On July 6, 2017, Jameka Evans' attorneys announced they would take her case all the way to the Supreme Court. Evans' announcement follows the 11th Circuit's refusal to grant her request for a rehearing en banc of the court's earlier ruling, by a 3-judge panel, that sexual orientation discrimination is not sex discrimination under Title VII. That panel based its ruling on binding 11th Circuit precedent, writing it could not hold otherwise until the earlier decision was overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court or the 11th Circuit sitting en banc.
The 11th Circuit's decision to deny en banc review parts ways with two other circuits.
In April of this year, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals granted an en banc review of a 3-judge panel's ruling in Hively v. Ivy Tech. Like the 11th Circuit, the 3-judge panel held it was bound by prior precedent to hold that sex discrimination does not encompass sexual orientation discrimination. On review, the full court overturned the old ruling, underscoring "the common-sense reality that it is actually impossible to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation without discriminating on the basis of sex." It also called out the fallacy of courts' ongoing attempts to differentiate between gender non-conformity discrimination, a cognizable Title VII claim, and sexual orientation discrimination, aptly observing that not being heterosexual is "the ultimate case of failure to conform" to gender stereotypes.
In May 2017, the 2nd Circuit agreed to review en banc a 3-judge panel decision affirming the dismissal of gay skydiving instructor's sexual orientation discrimination claim. The 2nd Circuit panel also based its ruling on dated but binding precedent. The full court is set to hear the case on September 26, 2017.
All will have to wait to see if the Supreme Court agrees to hear Evans' case. Given the circuit split created by the 11th Circuit's decision and recent momentum in LGBTQ rights cases, it will likely agree to hear the case.
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee

In The News
Sep 3, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Analyzes FTC Suit over Amazon’s Advertising Pricing Practices

In The News
Sep 2, 2026
Yvonne Ocrant Discusses Horse Business Legal Protection on the EquineRevShare Podcast

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 2, 2026
Two Key Wins for Mortgage Lenders on Illinois Statute of Limitations

Press Release
Sep 2, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Reappointed to CBA's Antitrust & Trade Regulation Section Executive Committee


