Evans Vows to Take Sexual Orientation Discrimination Case to the U.S. Supreme Court
2 min read
Jul 7, 2017
The Supreme Court may soon answer the most significant question to arise under Title VII in recent years: is sexual orientation discrimination "sex discrimination" within the meaning of the statute? The case to watch: Evans v. Georgia Regional Hospital.
On July 6, 2017, Jameka Evans' attorneys announced they would take her case all the way to the Supreme Court. Evans' announcement follows the 11th Circuit's refusal to grant her request for a rehearing en banc of the court's earlier ruling, by a 3-judge panel, that sexual orientation discrimination is not sex discrimination under Title VII. That panel based its ruling on binding 11th Circuit precedent, writing it could not hold otherwise until the earlier decision was overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court or the 11th Circuit sitting en banc.
The 11th Circuit's decision to deny en banc review parts ways with two other circuits.
In April of this year, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals granted an en banc review of a 3-judge panel's ruling in Hively v. Ivy Tech. Like the 11th Circuit, the 3-judge panel held it was bound by prior precedent to hold that sex discrimination does not encompass sexual orientation discrimination. On review, the full court overturned the old ruling, underscoring "the common-sense reality that it is actually impossible to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation without discriminating on the basis of sex." It also called out the fallacy of courts' ongoing attempts to differentiate between gender non-conformity discrimination, a cognizable Title VII claim, and sexual orientation discrimination, aptly observing that not being heterosexual is "the ultimate case of failure to conform" to gender stereotypes.
In May 2017, the 2nd Circuit agreed to review en banc a 3-judge panel decision affirming the dismissal of gay skydiving instructor's sexual orientation discrimination claim. The 2nd Circuit panel also based its ruling on dated but binding precedent. The full court is set to hear the case on September 26, 2017.
All will have to wait to see if the Supreme Court agrees to hear Evans' case. Given the circuit split created by the 11th Circuit's decision and recent momentum in LGBTQ rights cases, it will likely agree to hear the case.
Featured Insights

Webinar
Jul 14, 2026
Scott Seaman Presents on Horizontal vs. Vertical Exhaustion of Insurance

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Brian McGrath Discusses Far-Reaching Impact of a NY Foreclosure Ruling on Mortgage Industry

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Jason Oliveri Discusses AI Companions in Elder Care and the Risks for LGBTQ+ Residents



