The Third Circuit Takes a More Expansive Approach to What Constitutes a Debt Collector under the FDCPA
On February 22, 2019, the Third Circuit in Barbato v. Greystone Alliance, LLC, issued a decision that expands the scope of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act's (FDCPA) definition of the term "debt collector" to any entity that acquires debt for the purpose of collection, but outsources the actual debt collection activity.
In Barbato, Defendant Crown Asset purchased Plaintiff's debt but referred the account to a third-party servicer for collection. The third-party servicer contacted Plaintiff regarding the debt. Crown Asset did not directly communicate with Plaintiff, but Plaintiff argued that Crown Asset qualified as a "debt collector." Crown Asset maintained it did not qualify as a "debt collector" because its principal business purpose is not the collection of debts. The FDCPA defines a "debt collector" as "any person who uses any instrumentality of interstate commerce or the mails in any business the principal purpose of which is the collection of any debts." The Third Circuit held that Crown Asset qualified as a "debt collector" even though it did not perform any debt collection. The Court concluded that a business is a debt collector under the FDCPA so long as it obtains payment on the debts it acquires in default, even though it hires another to perform the collection.
This ruling provides a different perspective on what entities qualify as debt collectors. For example, in Dorrian v. LVNV Funding, LLC, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that passive debt buyers like Crown Asset do not qualify as "debt collectors" under the Massachusetts Fair Debt Collection Practices Act's (MDCPA) definition, which tracks the FDCPA's definition. The Massachusetts Court determined because passive debt buyers have no employees and no contact with the debtors they are outside of Congress' core concerns in legislating the FDCPA. So we will have to watch which courts decide to follow the Barbato analysis and which ones apply the reasoning in Dorrian.
Topics
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

