The CFPB is not going anywhere—Except Maybe the U.S. Supreme Court—Following DC Circuit en banc Decision
We've been following PHH's longstanding challenge of the CFPB's imposition of a fine against it for alleged RESPA kickback violations, through which elemental questions regarding the Bureau's constitutionality were tested.
On Wednesday, January 31, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the CFPB's single director structure was constitutional, nearly 8 months after the en banc panel heard oral arguments. The 7-3 full court vote reversed its prior 2-1 decision of unconstitutionality.
The Court appeared to carefully measure the fine line between Congressional intent to keep the Bureau insulated from political swings and the possibility of the Bureau's structure usurping presidential executive functions by not allowing a new President to remove the director at will. Ultimately, the DC Court decided that ruling in PHH's favor would have created rocky precedent for many single director agencies.
Importantly, the fine against PHH for RESPA violations to the tune of approximately $109 million continued to be vacated, consistent with the DC Circuit's prior decision. The retroactive interpretation of RESPA to expand the time period for potential violations was ruled unlawful, and the court provided helpful language on the three year statute of limitations applying to both civil enforcement and administrative proceedings under RESPA.
Even though PHH received a partial victory, there will likely be pressure for it to petition the United States Supreme Court to take the case regarding the CFPB structure. There are sure to be more novel legal twists and turns involving issues like standing, mootness, and representation of the Bureau by someone other than the Solicitor General.
It will be interesting to watch the manner in which Acting CFPB Director Mick Mulvaney (or someone else ultimately confirmed by Congress) transitions the policies of the Bureau. If he maintains his overtures not to dismantle the Bureau, but rather, attempts to provide some balance to its functions, it will set the stage for long-term preservation of the Bureau's mission. This kind of an evaluation starts with following the details of how the Bureau is altering rule making agendas. Stay tuned, we'll track them for you.
Topics
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Webinar
Jul 14, 2026
Scott Seaman Presents on Horizontal vs. Vertical Exhaustion of Insurance

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers



