The CFPB is not going anywhere—Except Maybe the U.S. Supreme Court—Following DC Circuit en banc Decision
We've been following PHH's longstanding challenge of the CFPB's imposition of a fine against it for alleged RESPA kickback violations, through which elemental questions regarding the Bureau's constitutionality were tested.
On Wednesday, January 31, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the CFPB's single director structure was constitutional, nearly 8 months after the en banc panel heard oral arguments. The 7-3 full court vote reversed its prior 2-1 decision of unconstitutionality.
The Court appeared to carefully measure the fine line between Congressional intent to keep the Bureau insulated from political swings and the possibility of the Bureau's structure usurping presidential executive functions by not allowing a new President to remove the director at will. Ultimately, the DC Court decided that ruling in PHH's favor would have created rocky precedent for many single director agencies.
Importantly, the fine against PHH for RESPA violations to the tune of approximately $109 million continued to be vacated, consistent with the DC Circuit's prior decision. The retroactive interpretation of RESPA to expand the time period for potential violations was ruled unlawful, and the court provided helpful language on the three year statute of limitations applying to both civil enforcement and administrative proceedings under RESPA.
Even though PHH received a partial victory, there will likely be pressure for it to petition the United States Supreme Court to take the case regarding the CFPB structure. There are sure to be more novel legal twists and turns involving issues like standing, mootness, and representation of the Bureau by someone other than the Solicitor General.
It will be interesting to watch the manner in which Acting CFPB Director Mick Mulvaney (or someone else ultimately confirmed by Congress) transitions the policies of the Bureau. If he maintains his overtures not to dismantle the Bureau, but rather, attempts to provide some balance to its functions, it will set the stage for long-term preservation of the Bureau's mission. This kind of an evaluation starts with following the details of how the Bureau is altering rule making agendas. Stay tuned, we'll track them for you.
Topics
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology
