Forgiveness of Debt Can Prove Unforgiving, But a New Federal Court Decision Gives Cause for Optimism
A federal court in New Jersey recently dismissed a putative class action filed under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which had argued that it was deceptive conduct for a debt collector to inform the debtor that forgiveness of debt, in some circumstances, may be reportable to the Internal Revenue Service. The specific language included in the debt collector's letter was as follows: "We will report forgiveness of debt as required by the IRS regulations. Reporting is not required every time a debt is canceled or settled, and might not be required in your case."
The debtor in the case claimed that this language was deceptive because his debts were not subject to reporting. However, contrary to the debtor’s claim, simply invoking the IRS does not violate the FDCPA. The Court concluded that the IRS disclosure was not a representation of the law but instead contained only factual statements and could not violate the FDCPA. The Court found only one reasonable interpretation for the IRS disclosure: "in certain circumstances, debt settlement and/or discharge may be reportable to other IRS, not all settlements and/or discharges are reportable, and that the subject statement may not be applicable to the reader."
For debt collectors, the key takeaway from this decision was the Court's reliance on explicit clarifying language in the IRS disclosure. Other courts have refused to dismiss cases where the IRS disclosure did not include this clarifying language: See Medina v. AllianceOne Receivables Mgmt., No. 16-4664, 2017 WL 220328, at * 1 (E.D. Penn. Jan. 19, 2017)(finding possible FDCPA violation because IRS disclosure stating "we will report forgiveness of debt as required by IRS regulations" could be open to two interpretations, one of which was inaccurate); Bautz v. ARS Nat’l Servs., No. 16-cv-768(JFB)(SIL), 2016 WL 7422301, at* 1 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2016).
Download a copy of the decision here, Schultz v. Midland Credit Management, Inc., No. 16-4415(JLL) (D.N.J. May 8, 2017).
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Event
Apr 23, 2026
Driving Ahead: Insights from Industry Leaders Auto Finance Seminar

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Mar 13, 2026
DOJ Settlement with Car Retailer Highlights SCRA Repossession Risks

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Mar 11, 2026
Compliance Considerations for GDPR Consent in Biotech Clinical Research

Press Release
Mar 4, 2026
Marcia Mueller Named the 2026 Mentorship Award Winner by YWCA Northwestern Illinois

Press Release
Mar 3, 2026
Hinshaw Announces New Administrative Leadership Appointments

In The News
Feb 27, 2026
Hinshaw Partners Examine Implications for Nursing Homes of New Illinois Aid-in-Dying Law

In The News
Feb 24, 2026
Lucy Wang Authors Law360 “Expert Analysis” on Why Attorney Civility Means More in 2026

Press Release
Feb 13, 2026
Hinshaw Team Wins Appeal in Criminal Indictment of Waukegan City Clerk Janet Kilkelly

Press Release
Feb 10, 2026
Hinshaw Trial Team Secures $0 Defense Verdict in $15 Million Auto Accident Trial

Press Release
Feb 5, 2026
Hinshaw Legal Team Secures Directed Verdict in Florida Equine Fraud Case

Press Release
Feb 4, 2026
Hinshaw Celebrates 17 Consecutive Years of Being Named an Equality 100 Award Winner
![[Video] New Regulatory Priorities Under Mayor Mamdani’s NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection](/a/web/oHiTWa7kRy3Ht1brq6k4BT/bkMx39/new-york-city-skyline.jpg)
