Forgiveness of Debt Can Prove Unforgiving, But a New Federal Court Decision Gives Cause for Optimism
A federal court in New Jersey recently dismissed a putative class action filed under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which had argued that it was deceptive conduct for a debt collector to inform the debtor that forgiveness of debt, in some circumstances, may be reportable to the Internal Revenue Service. The specific language included in the debt collector's letter was as follows: "We will report forgiveness of debt as required by the IRS regulations. Reporting is not required every time a debt is canceled or settled, and might not be required in your case."
The debtor in the case claimed that this language was deceptive because his debts were not subject to reporting. However, contrary to the debtor’s claim, simply invoking the IRS does not violate the FDCPA. The Court concluded that the IRS disclosure was not a representation of the law but instead contained only factual statements and could not violate the FDCPA. The Court found only one reasonable interpretation for the IRS disclosure: "in certain circumstances, debt settlement and/or discharge may be reportable to other IRS, not all settlements and/or discharges are reportable, and that the subject statement may not be applicable to the reader."
For debt collectors, the key takeaway from this decision was the Court's reliance on explicit clarifying language in the IRS disclosure. Other courts have refused to dismiss cases where the IRS disclosure did not include this clarifying language: See Medina v. AllianceOne Receivables Mgmt., No. 16-4664, 2017 WL 220328, at * 1 (E.D. Penn. Jan. 19, 2017)(finding possible FDCPA violation because IRS disclosure stating "we will report forgiveness of debt as required by IRS regulations" could be open to two interpretations, one of which was inaccurate); Bautz v. ARS Nat’l Servs., No. 16-cv-768(JFB)(SIL), 2016 WL 7422301, at* 1 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2016).
Download a copy of the decision here, Schultz v. Midland Credit Management, Inc., No. 16-4415(JLL) (D.N.J. May 8, 2017).
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

