Congress Takes a Significant Step Towards Replacing Dodd-Frank and Gutting the CFPB
On Thursday, as we anticipated in a previous blog post, the House of Representatives voted along party lines to pass the Financial CHOICE ACT ("FCA"), which would repeal Dodd-Frank and strip the CFPB of its authority.
The debate leading up to the vote also appeared to divide sharply along partisan lines, with Republicans urging their colleagues to vote for the Bill, and Democrats insisting that it was the "Wrong Choice" for Americans. Despite their differing opinions, representatives from all parties appeared to articulate the same goal: putting Main Street America ahead of Wall Street.
Supporters of the FCA contend that the purported benefits of Dodd-Frank have never materialized. They argue that due to Dodd-Frank’s excessive and expensive regulatory burdens, small banks and businesses have failed, while big banks have continued to thrive. Imposing the same regulations on every financial institution, they say, has strangled small community banks, and forced many to shut down. This problem triggered another major concern of the bill's supporters, namely an alleged lack of choice of financial products and the increased cost of these same products.
Unsurprisingly, one of the biggest points of contention over the FCA is the CFPB. Those Congressional representatives opposing the FCA are concerned that it will gut what they call the "Cop of the Beat" of Wall Street. Democrats cited statistics showing the CFPB obtained $12 billion in restitution for 29 million Americans, as proof of Dodd-Frank’s and the CFPB’s success. Republicans responded by arguing that the CFPB has not been the cop on the beat that it was supposed to be, and was instead "asleep at the wheel," according to Missouri Representative Ann Wagner (R).
Many Republican representatives have argued that the current regulations and enforcement agency have only restricted access to mortgages, car loans, and other credit for low-income Americans. Kentucky Representative Andy Barr (R) emphatically suggested that Dodd-Frank and the CFPB have "clogged the plumbing of our economy with an avalanche of red tape," and argued that removing these "barriers to economic recovery" in our country will benefit all working Americans.
The vote was 233 to 186, on a strict party line vote. It remains an open question if the FCA becomes law, as it would require the support of Democrats in the Senate to reach the President’s desk. (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2017/roll289.xml)
Featured Insights

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

