Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP is pleased to announce that senior counsel Adam Topel has been appointed Chair-Elect of the American Bar Association’s (ABA) Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section (TIPS) Appellate Advocacy Committee for the 2026—2027 bar year. 

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP is proud to announce that BTI Consulting has ranked the firm as a “Powerhouse in Litigation”—the highest client satisfaction tier—in its “BTI Litigation Outlook 2027: More Aggressive. More Complexity. Higher Stakes.” client survey.

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP is pleased to announce that 80 of its lawyers have been recognized by their peers for inclusion in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Read an analysis co-authored by Hinshaw attorneys Carol Rooney and Adam Topel in the latest edition of the ABA Tort, Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, which breaks down the most consequential appellate decisions from the US Supreme Court's October 2024 Term.

Read David Schultz’s AccountsRecovery.net ARM Compliance Digest column analyzing a New Jersey Appellate Division decision holding that using a letter vendor to print and mail collection notices does not violate the FDCPA.

Read Hinshaw partner Carol Rooney’s co-authored ABA TIPS Law Journal survey of key appellate developments from the Supreme Court’s 2023 Term—offering practical takeaways for trial and appellate practitioners.

Catherine Weiler, a Chicago-based partner and president of the Appellate Lawyers Association (ALA), will deliver the opening remarks at the 2025 edition of ALA’s annual roundtable luncheon with the Justices of the Illinois Supreme Court.

Chicago-based partner Catherine Basque Weiler will moderate the virtual seminar "United States Supreme Court Year In Review," hosted by the Appellate Lawyers Association (ALA) and DuPage County Bar Association (DCBA) on September 26, 2024. The seminar will examine recent significant United States Supreme Court opinions and provide key insights for appellate practice.

Hinshaw Appellate Practice attorney Gretchen Harris Sperry will be featured speaker at the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education's (IICLE's) Civil Appellate Practice Institute, which runs from 8:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. (CT) on Thursday, November 5, 2015. Mr. Hardy will present from 10:50–11:15 a.m. on "Interlocutory Appeals," and Ms. Sperry will present from 11:40 a.m.–12:05 p.m. on "Motion Practice."

Carol Rooney will present at the upcoming American Bar Association (ABA) webinar, “Clerkin' to Workin': Becoming an Appellate Attorney,” on October 29 at 1:00 pm EDT.

The US Supreme Court has issued its ruling in a case that considered whether a federal court that had sent a dispute to arbitration retains jurisdiction to vacate or confirm a subsequent arbitration award.

Our new blog post examines the US Supreme Court’s recent oral argument on whether district courts can confirm or vacate arbitration awards under the FAA after compelling arbitration.

Read our blog post regarding the Office of the Comptroller Currency’s (OCC) amicus brief urging the Seventh Circuit to halt the Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act (IFPA) before it takes effect on July 1, 2026.

Download or read the complete newsletter here: Medical Litigation Newsletter - June 2013

Download or read the complete newsletter here: Medical Litigation Newsletter - April 2011

No “Cat’s Paw” Claim Where Supervisor Was Terminated for Violating Policy

On June 22, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC and held that, primarily for stare decisis reasons, it would not overrule Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U.S. 29 (1964), which had prohibited post-patent expiration royalties for use of formerly patented inventions. While not endorsing the economics underpinning Brulotte, the Court viewed Congress as the appropriate audience to resolve any complaints.

On November 29, 2012, the Illinois Supreme Court accepted the petition for leave to appeal in Crittenden v. Cook County Commission on Human Rights. Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Cook County Commission on Human Rights, alleging that her employer had sexually assaulted her in violation of the Cook County Human Rights Ordinance. The Commission awarded plaintiff compensatory damages and $5,000 in punitive damages. The appellate court reversed the award of punitive damages, holding that the Commission was not authorized under the ordinance to award punitive damages because the ordinance does not expressly authorize the award of such damages.Download to read the appellate court’s decision in Crittenden v. Cook County Commission on Human Rights, 2012 IL App (1st) 112437.Download PDF

On September 26, 2012, the Illinois Supreme Court accepted the petition for leave to appeal in Standard Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lay. The insured real estate agency sent more than 3,400 unsolicited faxes, resulting in it being named as a defendant in a class action. The agency settled the lawsuit and assigned to the plaintiff class its rights to payment from the agency’s insurer.

Lateral Movement – Another Take on the Unfinished Business Rule

Unauthorized Practice of Law — Federal Practice — Disclosure Obligations When Lawyers Practice in States Where They are Not Admitted

Personal Interest Conflicts—Investment in Clients or Their Transactions— Malpractice Insurance Coverage—Policy Exclusions

Plaintiff, JBS Carriers, Inc. (“JBS”), sued Chamblee Ryan, P.C. (the “defendant”) for legal malpractice related to JBS’ alleged lost opportunity to settle the underlying personal injury case in which the defendant had been representing JBS.

The First District Appellate Court in Illinois held that the trial court (Judge Patrick J. Sherlock) was correct in entering a default judgment against an attorney in a legal malpractice action after the attorney repeatedly fabricated his expert witness disclosures "from whole cloth."

A Colorado Appellate Court upheld the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a legal malpractice action related to an underlying shareholder dispute. The plaintiff was unable to prove that the defendants' negligence in not timely disclosing a valuation expert was the "but for" cause of the plaintiff's damages from an inadequate settlement of the underlying case.

Download or read the complete newsletter here: Medical Litigation Newsletter - December 2013

Download or read the complete newsletter here: Medical Litigation Newsletter - August 2013

Download the hardcopy newsletter: The Report Card - February 2013