Illinois Restaurant Association Backs City of Chicago Food Truck Ordinance in Amicus Brief
Press Release | 2 min read
Feb 4, 2019
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP recently filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Illinois Restaurant Association, in a case currently before the Illinois Supreme Court. At issue is a challenge to the City of Chicago's mobile food vendor ordinance, first adopted in 2012. Under the ordinance, food trucks are prohibited from parking within 200 feet of any brick and mortar establishment that serves food. The ordinance also mandates that food trucks carry GPS devices. Prior to the appeal to the Supreme Court, the ordinance was upheld as constitutional at both the trial court and the appellate court level. Partner and Chair of the Firm's Appellate Practice Gretchen Harris Sperry and Firm Managing Partner Robert T. Shannon represented the industry group in the filing.
In its amicus brief, the Illinois Restaurant Association explains why the ordinance is an appropriate and legitimate exercise of government policy. In particular, it describes the significant and positive impact of the restaurant industry on the City's economic, cultural and urbanization objectives, and also how a decision invalidating the 200-foot rule would affect its members.
The brief sets out how the City depends on the restaurant industry as a "centerpiece of tourism;" how, as long-term investors in their communities, restaurants help create stability and maintain property values; and how, in an industry that already operates on "razor-thin" margins, the consequences of losing business to unregulated food trucks will mean restaurants will be forced to close, negatively impacting tourism and contributions to the tax base. Accordingly, it calls for the Court to uphold the 200-foot rule as a fair and legitimate compromise between restaurateurs and food truck operators.
In its brief, the Illinois Restaurant Association also calls on the Court to uphold the GPS tracking device requirement, because it is "imperative that there be a method by which food trucks can be located in case of an outbreak of food borne illness."
The case has received significant Chicago media coverage, including these articles:
NPR Illinois: "Chicago Food Trucks Take Beef with City to State's High Court"
Chicago Tribune: "State Supreme Court fight over food truck limits: 'Proper' balancing of interests or 'blatant protectionism'?"
WEBZ: "The Future Of Food Trucks In Chicago"
The case is LMP Services v. The City of Chicago, No. 123123. Download a copy of the Illinois Restaurant Association amicus brief (PDF)
Featured Insights

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)


