Attorney Who Refers Matter For a Fee Has Duty to Act if Receiving Lawyer Commits Misconduct
Lawyers for the Profession® Alert
Lawyers for the Profession® Alert | 2 min read
Jan 20, 2011
Wisconsin State Bar Standing Committee on Professional Ethics, Formal Op. EF-10-02 (October 27, 2010)
Brief Summary
The Wisconsin State Bar Standing Committee on Professional Ethics opined that attorneys who refer matters not only must monitor the referred matter, but also must step in to protect the client’s interests if the receiving lawyer appears to commit misconduct, acts incompetently or becomes unable to act.
Complete Summary
The Wisconsin State Bar Committee on Professional Ethics (Committee) addressed the duties of attorneys on both sides of a client referral when referral fees are involved. While a prior Wisconsin ethics opinion focused on the referring lawyer’s duties to monitor the referred matter, to choose a receiving attorney based on competence, and to assume financial responsibility for the matter, the present opinion focused on the referring lawyer’s duties when concerns arise in relation to the receiving attorney’s conduct.
In the event that the receiving lawyer acts improperly or incompetently, or becomes unable to act (through illness, suspension or otherwise), the referring attorney must take steps to protect the client. The referring lawyer might, for example, appear in the matter. Although the referring attorney need not have the same level of expertise or experience as the receiving lawyer, he or she must be able to at least take limited action on behalf of the client such as seeking adjournments or new counsel to take over the matter.
The Committee also opined on issues of shared financial responsibility, informed consent, confidentiality and conflicts of interest. The Committee noted that the degree of each lawyer’s shared financial responsibility can be determined by agreement between the attorneys. Moreover, the terms of such an agreement, and of the referral in general, are subject to the client’s pre-referral informed consent. Similarly, given the referring lawyer’s confidentiality obligations, the referring attorney must obtain the client’s informed consent before discussing the potential referral with a receiving lawyer. And because the referring lawyer maintains an attorney-client relationship, the conflict of interest rules apply fully to it, and the referring lawyer must maintain an actively licensed status as with any other client.
Significance of Opinion
This opinion highlights the many considerations that attorneys in a referral matter should weigh, including the responsibility they may incur if problems arise with the receiving lawyer’s representation.
This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

