Second Reservation of Rights Letter Was Not Needed
Insights for Insurers Alert | 1 min read
Jan 25, 2012
Plaintiff insurer issued a reservation of rights letter to its insured after receiving a courtesy copy of a subrogation complaint from defendant insurer before defendant insurer filed the complaint. After defendant insurer filed the one-count complaint, plaintiff insurer undertook its insured’s defense without issuing a second reservation of rights. Plaintiff insurer defended its insured through judgment without issuing a reservation of rights letter. The court held that there is no requirement that a reservation of rights be sent after the filing of the underlying complaint. The court reasoned that the better rule is that a reservation of rights letter be sent earlier rather than later. Thus, plaintiff insurer was not estopped to raise its coverage defense. The court noted that if the filed complaint raised new issues, a second letter might be required.
The court discussed the requirements of a reservation of rights letter, and stated that a reservation of rights must adequately inform the insured of the rights the insurer intends to reserve. The letter must specifically reference the policy defenses relied upon by the insurer and a potential conflict of interest. Because defendant insurer’s underlying complaint was a one-count negligence complaint, the court concluded there was no conflict of interest created by plaintiff insurer raising the intentional injury exclusion because both plaintiff insurer and the insured would have profited from a finding that the insured was not negligent.
Practice Note
An insurer should promptly issue a reservation of rights letter upon receipt of a claim and may not be required to re-issue it after a suit is filed.
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Westfield Insurance Company, 2011 IL App. (4th 110088)
This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

