Second Reservation of Rights Letter Was Not Needed
Insights for Insurers Alert | 1 min read
Jan 25, 2012
Plaintiff insurer issued a reservation of rights letter to its insured after receiving a courtesy copy of a subrogation complaint from defendant insurer before defendant insurer filed the complaint. After defendant insurer filed the one-count complaint, plaintiff insurer undertook its insured’s defense without issuing a second reservation of rights. Plaintiff insurer defended its insured through judgment without issuing a reservation of rights letter. The court held that there is no requirement that a reservation of rights be sent after the filing of the underlying complaint. The court reasoned that the better rule is that a reservation of rights letter be sent earlier rather than later. Thus, plaintiff insurer was not estopped to raise its coverage defense. The court noted that if the filed complaint raised new issues, a second letter might be required.
The court discussed the requirements of a reservation of rights letter, and stated that a reservation of rights must adequately inform the insured of the rights the insurer intends to reserve. The letter must specifically reference the policy defenses relied upon by the insurer and a potential conflict of interest. Because defendant insurer’s underlying complaint was a one-count negligence complaint, the court concluded there was no conflict of interest created by plaintiff insurer raising the intentional injury exclusion because both plaintiff insurer and the insured would have profited from a finding that the insured was not negligent.
Practice Note
An insurer should promptly issue a reservation of rights letter upon receipt of a claim and may not be required to re-issue it after a suit is filed.
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Westfield Insurance Company, 2011 IL App. (4th 110088)
This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 14, 2026
Key Takeaways from the 2026 MBA Legal Issues and Regulatory Compliance Conference

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 14, 2026
SCOTUS Confirms: Federal Courts Retain Power to Affirm or Vacate an Arbitration Decision

In The News
May 13, 2026
Hinshaw Contributes Chapters to “Wrongful-Death and Survival Actions” IICLE Handbook

In The News
May 12, 2026
Hinshaw GC Steve Puiszis Discusses Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in an AI Age

Event
May 12-13, 2026
Mitchel Chargo Speaks on the Rapidly Evolving Cannabis Industry

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 11, 2026
Tennessee Reaches Settlement with Mariner in Multistate UDAAP Enforcement Action

Press Release
May 11, 2026
Ali Degan Elected to the Fellows of the American Bar Foundation

Press Release
May 11, 2026
John Weedon Re-Elected to the Jacksonville Bar Association’s Board of Governors in 2026

Press Release
May 7, 2026
Hinshaw Recognized as a 2026 BTI Associate Satisfaction A-Lister Firm



