DHS Memo Outlines Plan to Use Administrative Warrants for ICE Home Arrests
A May 2025 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) memorandum recently became public, indicating that DHS intends to rely on its own administrative warrants—known as a Form I‑205—to arrest individuals without legal immigration status within their own homes. It is not yet clear whether DHS has actually used these administrative warrants to enter homes or businesses and make arrests, although anecdotal reports suggest agents may have done so.
On January 7, 2026, the nonprofit organization Whistleblower Aid filed a formal disclosure with Congress on behalf of two anonymous government officials, and several active lawsuits have been filed by states and advocacy groups targeting the tactics authorized by this memo.
Under the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, law enforcement officers generally may not enter a residence to arrest someone without first obtaining a valid arrest warrant issued by a judge.
A judicial arrest warrant must be signed and dated by a federal or state judge or magistrate judge and must identify the individual to be arrested and the offense. Because judicial arrest warrants are issued by a neutral judge who is independent of the prosecutorial process, they serve as an important safeguard of individual rights.
When Can ICE Enter a Home or Residence?
According to DHS’s May 12, 2025, memorandum, DHS’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers and agents may arrest an individual without lawful immigration status within their home or residence based solely on an I‑205 administrative warrant.
An I‑205 is a warrant of removal or deportation signed by an immigration officer. It is called an administrative warrant because it is issued by DHS, which is an agency of the executive branch of the US government.
An immigration officer is not necessarily a neutral party like a judge because the immigration officer is part of the same executive branch that authorized the underlying final order of removal. It appears from the memorandum that this policy applies nationwide except in the Central District of California under a 2024 court ruling.
Implications for Businesses
DHS’s memorandum does not address arrests at businesses, but this situation is almost certain to present itself. The memorandum makes it clear that officers may enter the illegal alien’s own residence with a valid I-205 warrant.
It is possible that ICE’s officers and agents may extend this reasoning to justify an arrest with a valid I-205 warrant at a business owned or operated by the illegal alien. By contrast, the memorandum states that an administrative arrest warrant does not permit officers or agents to enter a third party’s residence without consent, an emergency, or a judicial warrant.
ICE officers and agents, therefore, would likely not have authority under the DHS memorandum to enter a large retail store where a person is shopping to arrest them based on an administrative warrant.
Exigent Circumstances
The memorandum also outlines “exigent circumstances” that constitute exceptions to DHS’s new general rule that a valid I-205 permits officers and agents to arrest an illegal alien in their home.
Those exceptions include hot pursuit, risk of evidence destruction, potential violence, attempts to flee, and situations where waiting for a warrant would create a substantial risk of harm to people or to law enforcement efforts. Under any of those exceptions, ICE might well decide it has legal justification to follow an illegal alien into a business to arrest them, even without a valid I-205 warrant.
We Are Here to Help
For questions and help on this matter, please contact Hinshaw’s immigration and government teams.
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Webinar
Jul 14, 2026
Scott Seaman Presents on Horizontal vs. Vertical Exhaustion of Insurance



