Steve Puiszis Discusses the MSBA Opinion in Light of GDPR's "Right to be Forgotten" in Bloomberg Law
In The News | 1 min read
Oct 19, 2018
Hinshaw's Chicago-based partner Steve Puiszis, who also serves as the firm's General Counsel Privacy, Security and Compliance, was featured in a Bloomberg Law article titled "Bar Advises on Conflict Checks in a GDPR World." Focused on a new legal ethics opinion issued by the Maryland State Bar Association (MSBA) on October 2, 2018, the article discusses how the opinion could potentially affect the process for running conflicts checks for U.S. firms with international clients, particularly when such clients invoke the "right to be forgotten" under the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
"In my opinion retaining personal information in a conflicts database necessary to run a conflicts check fits easily within that exemption," Puiszis said, referring to Article 17(3)(e) of the GDPR, which states that the right of erasure doesn't apply to the extent the information is necessary for the "establishment, exercise or defense of legal claims."
Read "Bar Advises on Conflict Checks in a GDPR World," on the Bloomberg Law website (subscription may be required)
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Press Release
Oct 9, 2026
Adam Topel Appointed Chair-Elect of the ABA’s TIPS Appellate Advocacy Committee

Press Release
Oct 8, 2026
Technology Service Corporation Closes on Acquisition by Blackstone-Backed Purchaser

Employment Law Observer
Oct 8, 2026
“We Didn’t Know” is No Longer an Employer Defense for Religious Accommodation Claims Under Title VII

In The News
Oct 8, 2026
Lucy Wang Analyzes What Insurers Need to Know About Two New California Laws

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Oct 8, 2026
The Rise of Management Service Organizations: How Lawyers and Lawmakers are Responding

In The News
Oct 7, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses Google’s Coverage Battle Over Social Media Addiction Claims

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 6, 2026
Mixed Messages Ongoing as Courts Disagree Whether Texts Constitute “Calls” Under the TCPA






