Scott Seaman Discusses the Biggest Insurance Decisions of Mid-Year 2019 with Law360
In The News | 1 min read
Jun 21, 2019
Hinshaw attorney Scott Seaman, a Chicago-based partner and co-chair of the firm's national Insurance Services Practice Group, was quoted by Jeff Sistrunk of Law360 in an article titled "The Biggest Insurance Decisions of 2019: Midyear Report." The article reviews opinions that caught the attention of leading insurance lawyers in the first half of 2019.
Seaman first discussed a ruling by the Georgia Supreme Court titled First Acceptance Insurance Co v. Hughes, in which the court clarified that an insurer can't be sued for failing to settle a claim against its policyholder within policy limits unless it first received a valid settlement offer. According to Seaman, the justices recognized the "sound policy reasons" for requiring a valid settlement offer as a condition for a bad faith action, namely "avoiding unreliable, speculative, self-serving after-the-fact speculation about whether the injured party would have settled and avoiding collusion between the insured and the injured party."
Seaman also discussed two noteworthy Montana Supreme Court decisions, in which the court limited policyholders' ability to enter into "stipulated judgments" with an injured plaintiff.
Seaman noted that the first ruling—Abbey/Land LLC v. Glacier Construction Partners LLC—illustrates "the shenanigans" often associated with stipulated judgments, and demonstrates the "importance of allowing insurers latitude to challenge a stipulated judgment and to conduct discovery on the issues of reasonableness and collusion." He also praised the second ruling—Draggin' Y Cattle Co. v JCCS—for determining that no presumption of reasonableness applies to a policyholder's stipulated judgment when an insurer does not breach its duty to defend:
"Alleged acts or omissions such as refusing to affirm coverage, not filing a declaratory judgment to resolve issues raised by a reservation of rights letter, misrepresenting policy limits by contending defense costs erode limits are not tantamount to breaching the duty to defend."
Read the full article on the Law360 website (subscription may be required)
"The Biggest Insurance Decisions of 2019: Midyear Report" was published by Law360, June 18, 2019.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”


