Scott Seaman Discusses Persuasive Precedent Significance of Eighth Circuit COVID Coverage Ruling
In The News | 1 min read
Aug 6, 2021
Scott Seaman, the Chicago-based co-chair of Hinshaw's global Insurance Services Practice Group, discussed with Law360 the persuasive precedent significance of the Eighth Circuit's recent ruling in Oral Surgeons, P.C. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. In a filing last week, an insurer in a COVID coverage case asked the Iowa Supreme Court to look to the ruling in Oral Surgeons that pandemic-related business losses do not cause "physical loss of or damage to" property triggering coverage.
Seaman said that while insurance coverage is generally a matter of state law, the Eighth Circuit's ruling – along with future ones by federal courts of appeal – will be cited by parties and considered by state courts:
"The Eighth Circuit ruling in Oral Surgeons was well-reasoned and will receive attention, particularly as the first substantive circuit court of appeal decision on COVID insurance coverage."
Read the full article on the Law360 website (subscription may be required)
"Iowa Justices Told About 8th Circuit Ruling on COVID Coverage" was published by Law360 on August 5, 2021.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies


