Missouri Court of Appeals Hands a Win to Plaintiff in Asbestos Verdict
In The News | 1 min read
Apr 17, 2017
In the April edition of his Chicago Law Bulletin column, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP partner Craig Liljestrand – a member of the firms' Product Liability and Toxic Torts practice groups – analyzed the Missouri Court of Appeals decision in Urbach v. Okonite Co., No ED 104393, 2017 WL 1151067 (MO. Ct. App. March 28, 2017), applying Wisconsin law and holding that a defendant was partly responsible for the post-death loss of consortium damages from an electrician's asbestos exposures.
Liljestrand describes how the defendant sought to appeal its portion of the $4.16 million trial court verdict, arguing among other things a lack of causational proof and that the trial court incorrectly applied Wisconsin's damages cap on loss of consortium. The Court of Appeals rejected both arguments, finding the plaintiff had met the "substantial factor" test required for a negligence claim under Wisconsin law, and that the trial court correctly first apportioned liability between the plaintiff and defendant, and only then applied the cap.
Read the full article (PDF)
"Asbestos verdict finds for plaintiff despite testimony from co-workers" was published by the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required)
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Press Release
Oct 22, 2025
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP Launches New Website and Refreshed Brand

Press Release
Sep 26, 2025
Hinshaw Recognized as a “Leader in Litigation” in the BTI Consulting Litigation Outlook 2026 Survey

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Sep 23, 2025
Fall 2025 Regulatory Roundup: Top U.S. Privacy and AI Developments for Businesses to Track

Press Release
Sep 15, 2025
Hinshaw Achieves 2024–2025 Mansfield Rule Certification Plus Status

In The News
Sep 5, 2025
Jessica Riley Reflects in a Law360 Story on Lessons She Learned as a Junior Lawyer

Press Release
Aug 25, 2025
Trial Spotlight: Hinshaw Prevails in ERISA Fiduciary Fraud Case






