Matthew Knox and Peyton Phillips Consider: Are ‘Excessive’ Credit Card Late Fees Here to Stay?
Conference on Consumer Finance Law (CCFL) Quarterly Report Article
In The News | 1 min read
Jul 10, 2026
In the latest issue* of the Conference on Consumer Finance Law (CCFL) Quarterly Report, Hinshaw attorneys Matthew Knox and Peyton Phillips analyze a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) 2024 rule, which would have significantly impacted the financial services industry by slashing credit card late fees from $30 to $8 for large card issuers. However, the rule never took effect.
Matthew and Peyton trace the full lifecycle of the now-vacated Final Rule, from its policy origins under the Biden Administration through the landmark litigation in Chamber of Commerce of United States v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the consent judgment that ultimately struck it down.
Key Takeaways
Historical Background
The article explains how the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act (CARD Act) established the framework for “reasonable and proportional” credit card penalty fees and the safe harbor amounts that have governed late fees since 2010.
The Final Rule
In March 2024, the CFPB finalized a rule reducing safe harbor late fees to $8 for issuers with one million or more open accounts, eliminating annual inflation adjustments for larger issuers.
The Legal Challenge
A coalition led by the US Chamber of Commerce successfully argued that the rule violated the CARD Act by effectively preventing card issuers from imposing penalty fees altogether. This converts what Congress intended as a deterrence-based penalty into a mere cost-recovery mechanism.
The Outcome
In April 2025, the parties entered a consent judgment vacating the Final Rule, with the court finding that the CFPB had “impermissibly assumed the role of commissioner” rather than serving as the “umpire” Congress intended.
What’s Next
Although the Trump Administration aims to roll back the regulations set by the Biden Administration, future regulators may still attempt to reduce safe harbor fees, but they must preserve card issuers’ opportunity to charge penalty fees consistent with the CARD Act’s requirements. Credit card issuers of all sizes should continue monitoring the regulatory landscape.
-
- *Conference on Consumer Finance Law (CCFL): “Are ‘Excessive’ Credit Card Late Fees Here to Stay?“ (Vol. 78, No. 4 and Vol. 79, No. 1, 2026)
Featured Insights

In The News
Sep 28, 2026
Carol Rooney and Adam Topel Co-Author Article on Recent Developments in Appellate Advocacy

In The News
Sep 28, 2026
Lucy Wang Discusses New Landmark California Wildfire Insurance Reforms

Event
September 27–29, 2026
Hinshaw Partners Discuss Key Compliance and Litigation Issues at the 2026 MBA Conference

Press Release
Sep 24, 2026
Hinshaw Recognized as a 2027 “Powerhouse in Litigation” by BTI Consulting

Press Release
Sep 22, 2026
Vaishali Rao Selected as a Global 2026 INvolve Heroes Role Model

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 23, 2026
Another Court Finds the TCPA Does Not Apply to Texts —Time for Supreme Court Intervention?

Press Release
Sep 22, 2026
Min Kang Appointed to the Washington State Bar Association Board of Governors

In The News
Sep 22, 2026
Spencer Kook Analyzes California's Liability Influence in the National Insurance Market






