Matthew Knox and Peyton Phillips Consider Whether ‘Excessive’ Credit Card Late Fees Are Here to Stay
Conference on Consumer Finance Law (CCFL) Quarterly Report Article
In The News | 1 min read
Jul 10, 2026
In the latest issue* of the Conference on Consumer Finance Law (CCFL) Quarterly Report, Hinshaw attorneys Matthew Knox and Peyton Phillips analyze a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) 2024 rule, which would have significantly impacted the financial services industry by slashing credit card late fees from $30 to $8 for large card issuers. However, the rule never took effect.
Matthew and Peyton trace the full lifecycle of the now-vacated Final Rule, from its policy origins under the Biden Administration through the landmark litigation in Chamber of Commerce of United States v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the consent judgment that ultimately struck it down.
Key Takeaways
Historical Background
The article explains how the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act (CARD Act) established the framework for “reasonable and proportional” credit card penalty fees and the safe harbor amounts that have governed late fees since 2010.
The Final Rule
In March 2024, the CFPB finalized a rule reducing safe harbor late fees to $8 for issuers with one million or more open accounts, eliminating annual inflation adjustments for larger issuers.
The Legal Challenge
A coalition led by the US Chamber of Commerce successfully argued that the rule violated the CARD Act by effectively preventing card issuers from imposing penalty fees altogether. This converts what Congress intended as a deterrence-based penalty into a mere cost-recovery mechanism.
The Outcome
In April 2025, the parties entered a consent judgment vacating the Final Rule, with the court finding that the CFPB had “impermissibly assumed the role of commissioner” rather than serving as the “umpire” Congress intended.
What’s Next
Although the Trump Administration aims to roll back the regulations set by the Biden Administration, future regulators may still attempt to reduce safe harbor fees, but they must preserve card issuers’ opportunity to charge penalty fees consistent with the CARD Act’s requirements. Credit card issuers of all sizes should continue monitoring the regulatory landscape.
-
- *Conference on Consumer Finance Law (CCFL): “Are ‘Excessive’ Credit Card Late Fees Here to Stay?“ (Vol. 78, No. 4 and Vol. 79, No. 1, 2026)
Featured Insights

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Brian McGrath Discusses Far-Reaching Impact of a NY Foreclosure Ruling on Mortgage Industry

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Jason Oliveri Discusses AI Companions in Elder Care and the Risks for LGBTQ+ Residents

Event
June 25-26, 2026
Todd Young Speaks on Importance of Financial Literacy to ESOP Culture

Press Release
Jun 25, 2026
Scott Seaman Appointed to DRI Center for Law and Public Policy’s Social Inflation Task Force




