James Ryndak Discusses Significance of U.S. Supreme Court Decision Addressing Patent Damages
In The News | 1 min read
Jun 13, 2016
James D. Ryndak was quoted in the article "Attorneys React to High Court's Patent Damages Ruling" published by Law360 on June 13, 2016.
The article includes commentary from attorneys on the U.S. Supreme Court's June 13, 2016, ruling in the consolidated cases Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer. As noted in the article, the high court in this case discarded the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's strict test for awarding enhanced damages in patent cases, "finding that the circuit's high bar for patent owners was not justified under the Patent Act."
Stated Mr. Ryndak in the article:
The Supreme Court's decision today is a big victory for the U.S. patent system. It removes the 'Seagate stranglehold' that the Federal Circuit announced in its 2007 Seagate decision that made enhanced damages extremely difficult to obtain. Today, the Supreme Court took a big step to help restore U.S. patent law to a strong, meaningful system that is supposed to encourage and reward innovation and to punish copyists and unscrupulous infringers. The Supreme Court rejected the Federal Circuit's oppressive clear and convincing evidence standard and its unduly rigid, multiple high bar tests of 'objective recklessness' and risk of infringement that 'was either known or so obvious that it should have been known to the accused infringer' and finally the tripartite appellate review test requirements to obtain enhanced damages in patent infringement cases, finding them contrary to the patent statute and the court's precedent since the 1830s. The court's decision today essentially returns the enhanced damages law to the way it was for the past 180 years before the Federal Circuit put patent enhanced damages law in the Seagate stranglehold, similar in some ways to the court's Octane Fitness decision, rejecting the Federal Circuit's restrictions on attorneys' fees awards in patent cases.
Read the full article "Attorneys React to High Court's Patent Damages Ruling" on the Law360 website. Please note that a subscription is required.
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

