Hinshaw's Scott Seaman Discusses Implications of Delaware D&O Coverage Ruling
In The News | 2 min read
Mar 8, 2021
Hinshaw attorney Scott Seaman, a Chicago-based partner and co-chair of the global Insurance Services Practice Group, was recently quoted in Law360 on a recent D&O coverage ruling by the Delaware Supreme Court. In the case, the court ruled that Delaware, not California law governs the excess D&O policy in question. It further ruled that Delaware public policy did not bar coverage for the subject claim. The court affirmed the trial court’s ruling that the Profit/Fraud exclusion did not apply on the narrow ground that one of the two underlying matters was resolved by settlement and , therefore, did not satisfy the requirement of the exclusion that the underlying matter be resolved by adjudication. The court also affirmed the trial court’s application of the “larger loss” rule as opposed to the “relative exposure” rule to defense costs and costs of settling one of the two underlying matters. Finally, the court rejected the bad faith claim.
In the Law360 article, Seaman said that that the court's choice-of-law decision and its refusal to prohibit D&O coverage for fraud-based claims did not come as much of a surprise, given the state's business-friendly environment:
"The Delaware Supreme Court has enjoyed its prominence on corporate governance issues. Against this background it is not surprising that the court would place preeminence on the place of incorporation of a Delaware corporation in ruling on the choice of law in the context of D&O insurance policies. Nor is it surprising that the court would not take an expansive view of excluding coverage based upon 'public policy' grounds."
He cautioned, however, that the decision should not be viewed as establishing one-size-fits-all rules for addressing disputes under all types of insurance policies held by Delaware corporations:
"It should not be presumed that its approach on these issues would extend to coverage disputes under other types of policies where, for example, the court has looked more beyond place of incorporation in applying the most significant contacts test."
Read the full article (subscription may be required)
"Dole's Win Bolsters Del. Corporations in D&O Coverage Fights" was published by Law360, March 5, 2021.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Press Release
Nov 13, 2026
Hinshaw Advises Client Safe Harbor Capital Partners in $44 Million Financing

In The News
Nov 12, 2026
Spencer Kook Authors Article Providing a Claims Manager’s Guide to Class Action Exposure

In The News
Nov 12, 2026
Mitch Chargo Discusses Cannabis M&A Implications in a Post-Rescheduling Landscape

Webinar
Nov 12, 2026
Michael Adams Presents on Navigating Ethics in the Digital Age

Event
Nov 12, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie Discusses AI and Supply Chain Cybersecurity

Healthcare Alert
Nov 11, 2026
Illinois Enacts 340B Contract Pharmacy Protections: 7 Steps Covered Entities Should Take

In The News
Nov 10, 2026
Brian Turetsky Examines How NYC’s Proposed POWER Act Could Expand Private UDAAP Claims

In The News
Nov 9, 2026
Kate Schnake Examines Unlawful Discrimination vs. Legitimate Advocacy in Jury Selection

Press Release
Nov 6, 2026
Hinshaw Recognized by the LCLD as a 2026 Compass Award Winner and Top Performer

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Nov 5, 2026
FDIC Proposes State Bank Preemption Parity Rule Regarding Host State Laws



