Hinshaw's Scott Seaman Discusses Implications of Delaware D&O Coverage Ruling
In The News | 2 min read
Mar 8, 2021
Hinshaw attorney Scott Seaman, a Chicago-based partner and co-chair of the global Insurance Services Practice Group, was recently quoted in Law360 on a recent D&O coverage ruling by the Delaware Supreme Court. In the case, the court ruled that Delaware, not California law governs the excess D&O policy in question. It further ruled that Delaware public policy did not bar coverage for the subject claim. The court affirmed the trial court’s ruling that the Profit/Fraud exclusion did not apply on the narrow ground that one of the two underlying matters was resolved by settlement and , therefore, did not satisfy the requirement of the exclusion that the underlying matter be resolved by adjudication. The court also affirmed the trial court’s application of the “larger loss” rule as opposed to the “relative exposure” rule to defense costs and costs of settling one of the two underlying matters. Finally, the court rejected the bad faith claim.
In the Law360 article, Seaman said that that the court's choice-of-law decision and its refusal to prohibit D&O coverage for fraud-based claims did not come as much of a surprise, given the state's business-friendly environment:
"The Delaware Supreme Court has enjoyed its prominence on corporate governance issues. Against this background it is not surprising that the court would place preeminence on the place of incorporation of a Delaware corporation in ruling on the choice of law in the context of D&O insurance policies. Nor is it surprising that the court would not take an expansive view of excluding coverage based upon 'public policy' grounds."
He cautioned, however, that the decision should not be viewed as establishing one-size-fits-all rules for addressing disputes under all types of insurance policies held by Delaware corporations:
"It should not be presumed that its approach on these issues would extend to coverage disputes under other types of policies where, for example, the court has looked more beyond place of incorporation in applying the most significant contacts test."
Read the full article (subscription may be required)
"Dole's Win Bolsters Del. Corporations in D&O Coverage Fights" was published by Law360, March 5, 2021.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee

In The News
Sep 3, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Analyzes FTC Suit over Amazon’s Advertising Pricing Practices

In The News
Sep 2, 2026
Yvonne Ocrant Discusses Horse Business Legal Protection on the EquineRevShare Podcast

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 2, 2026
Two Key Wins for Mortgage Lenders on Illinois Statute of Limitations

Press Release
Sep 2, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Reappointed to CBA's Antitrust & Trade Regulation Section Executive Committee



