David Schultz Analyzes in ARM Compliance Digest: Appeals Court Upholds Reasonableness of Dispute Investigation in FCRA Case
In The News | 1 min read
Jul 20, 2023
In the July 17, 2023 edition of the ARM Compliance Digest, Hinshaw partner David Schultz discussed a Seventh Circuit decision to uphold summary judgment in favor of a furnisher in a Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) case in which the furnisher was accused of providing inaccurate information after conducting an unreasonable investigation of the plaintiff's dispute. The court ruled that "no reasonable jury could find" that the furnisher "provided patently incorrect or materially misleading information."
Schultz writes:
In Frazier v Dovenmuehle, the Seventh Circuit provides another favorable FCRA reasonable investigation ruling. Two prior strong Seventh Circuit rulings are Walton v EOS and Westra v Credit Control. These are important rulings for furnishers defending FCRA cases.
The key part of the Frazier ruling is the standard the court adopted. The court stated that "incompleteness or inaccuracy under § 1681s-2(b) requires a showing that the information the data furnisher provided was (1) patently incorrect, or (2) materially misleading, including by omission. By materially misleading, we mean 'misleading in such a way and to such an extent that it can be expected to adversely affect credit decisions.'" That is a good standard for the industry.
This is the third circuit court ruling in the past year that affirmed summary judgment in favor of the furnisher on a reasonable investigation claim – Bibbs v Trans Union from the 3rd Circuit and Milgram v Chase Bank from the 11th Circuit. The Frazier court acknowledged it was consistent with Bibbs. The court noted Bibbs "involves the accuracy of a credit report under 15 U.S.C. § 1681e(b), [but] given our adoption of the patently incorrect or materially misleading standard from § 1681e(b) caselaw, the analogy is tight."
The tide of TCPA cases turned after the Facebook ruling. It also seems like there is a good trend in FCRA cases. Let's hope so.
Read the full July 17, 2023 edition of the AccountsRecovery.net Compliance Digest.
"Appeals Court Upholds Reasonableness of Dispute Investigation in FCRA Case" was published by ARM Compliance Digest on July 17, 2023
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

