David Schultz Analyzes in ARM Compliance Digest: Appeals Court Upholds Reasonableness of Dispute Investigation in FCRA Case
In The News | 1 min read
Jul 20, 2023
In the July 17, 2023 edition of the ARM Compliance Digest, Hinshaw partner David Schultz discussed a Seventh Circuit decision to uphold summary judgment in favor of a furnisher in a Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) case in which the furnisher was accused of providing inaccurate information after conducting an unreasonable investigation of the plaintiff's dispute. The court ruled that "no reasonable jury could find" that the furnisher "provided patently incorrect or materially misleading information."
Schultz writes:
In Frazier v Dovenmuehle, the Seventh Circuit provides another favorable FCRA reasonable investigation ruling. Two prior strong Seventh Circuit rulings are Walton v EOS and Westra v Credit Control. These are important rulings for furnishers defending FCRA cases.
The key part of the Frazier ruling is the standard the court adopted. The court stated that "incompleteness or inaccuracy under § 1681s-2(b) requires a showing that the information the data furnisher provided was (1) patently incorrect, or (2) materially misleading, including by omission. By materially misleading, we mean 'misleading in such a way and to such an extent that it can be expected to adversely affect credit decisions.'" That is a good standard for the industry.
This is the third circuit court ruling in the past year that affirmed summary judgment in favor of the furnisher on a reasonable investigation claim – Bibbs v Trans Union from the 3rd Circuit and Milgram v Chase Bank from the 11th Circuit. The Frazier court acknowledged it was consistent with Bibbs. The court noted Bibbs "involves the accuracy of a credit report under 15 U.S.C. § 1681e(b), [but] given our adoption of the patently incorrect or materially misleading standard from § 1681e(b) caselaw, the analogy is tight."
The tide of TCPA cases turned after the Facebook ruling. It also seems like there is a good trend in FCRA cases. Let's hope so.
Read the full July 17, 2023 edition of the AccountsRecovery.net Compliance Digest.
"Appeals Court Upholds Reasonableness of Dispute Investigation in FCRA Case" was published by ARM Compliance Digest on July 17, 2023
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Insights for Employers Alert
Jun 9, 2026
A Win for Employers: Federal District Court Finds $100,000 H-1B Visa Petition Fee is Unlawful

Press Release
Jun 9, 2026
Calvin Edwards Honored With 2026 Rising Star Award by the Black Men Lawyers’ Association

Webinar
Jun 9, 2026
John DeLascio Speaks on How Social Inflation is Reshaping Insurance Risk

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jun 8, 2026
Court Distinguishes Between Clickwrap and Browsewrap Arbitration Agreements

Webinar
Jun 8, 2026
Aimee Delaney and Jason Oliveri Speak on Workplace Generative AI Usage

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jun 8, 2026
New York’s Sweeping Motor Vehicle Tort Law Reforms: More Than Meets the Eye

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jun 5, 2026
AI Governance Expectations on the Rise for Insurers Amid New Regulatory Activity

Press Release
Jun 4, 2026
Hinshaw Recognized Nationally in 2026 Chambers USA Directory

In The News
Jun 3, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses Wrongful-Death and Survival Actions Handbook on IICLE Podcast




