David Schultz Analyzes in ARM Compliance Digest: Appeals Court Upholds Reasonableness of Dispute Investigation in FCRA Case
In The News | 1 min read
Jul 20, 2023
In the July 17, 2023 edition of the ARM Compliance Digest, Hinshaw partner David Schultz discussed a Seventh Circuit decision to uphold summary judgment in favor of a furnisher in a Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) case in which the furnisher was accused of providing inaccurate information after conducting an unreasonable investigation of the plaintiff's dispute. The court ruled that "no reasonable jury could find" that the furnisher "provided patently incorrect or materially misleading information."
Schultz writes:
In Frazier v Dovenmuehle, the Seventh Circuit provides another favorable FCRA reasonable investigation ruling. Two prior strong Seventh Circuit rulings are Walton v EOS and Westra v Credit Control. These are important rulings for furnishers defending FCRA cases.
The key part of the Frazier ruling is the standard the court adopted. The court stated that "incompleteness or inaccuracy under § 1681s-2(b) requires a showing that the information the data furnisher provided was (1) patently incorrect, or (2) materially misleading, including by omission. By materially misleading, we mean 'misleading in such a way and to such an extent that it can be expected to adversely affect credit decisions.'" That is a good standard for the industry.
This is the third circuit court ruling in the past year that affirmed summary judgment in favor of the furnisher on a reasonable investigation claim – Bibbs v Trans Union from the 3rd Circuit and Milgram v Chase Bank from the 11th Circuit. The Frazier court acknowledged it was consistent with Bibbs. The court noted Bibbs "involves the accuracy of a credit report under 15 U.S.C. § 1681e(b), [but] given our adoption of the patently incorrect or materially misleading standard from § 1681e(b) caselaw, the analogy is tight."
The tide of TCPA cases turned after the Facebook ruling. It also seems like there is a good trend in FCRA cases. Let's hope so.
Read the full July 17, 2023 edition of the AccountsRecovery.net Compliance Digest.
"Appeals Court Upholds Reasonableness of Dispute Investigation in FCRA Case" was published by ARM Compliance Digest on July 17, 2023
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 18, 2026
Paris Glazer Named to Chicago Daily Law Bulletin’s 2026 40 Attorneys Under Forty

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 17, 2026
Federal and State Regulators Continue Crackdown on Junk Fees

Press Release
Sep 17, 2026
Defense Verdict Reduces $134 Million Demand to $2 Million in Catastrophic Motorcycle Injury Case

Insights for Insurers Alert
Sep 16, 2026
America 250: The Nation’s Unique Contributions to Insurance Coverage Law and Litigation

In The News
Sep 15, 2026
Lucy Wang Discusses the California Insurance Commissioner’s Role in Protecting Consumers

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee


