David Schultz Analyzes in ARM Compliance Digest: Appeals Court Upholds Reasonableness of Dispute Investigation in FCRA Case
In The News | 1 min read
Jul 20, 2023
In the July 17, 2023 edition of the ARM Compliance Digest, Hinshaw partner David Schultz discussed a Seventh Circuit decision to uphold summary judgment in favor of a furnisher in a Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) case in which the furnisher was accused of providing inaccurate information after conducting an unreasonable investigation of the plaintiff's dispute. The court ruled that "no reasonable jury could find" that the furnisher "provided patently incorrect or materially misleading information."
Schultz writes:
In Frazier v Dovenmuehle, the Seventh Circuit provides another favorable FCRA reasonable investigation ruling. Two prior strong Seventh Circuit rulings are Walton v EOS and Westra v Credit Control. These are important rulings for furnishers defending FCRA cases.
The key part of the Frazier ruling is the standard the court adopted. The court stated that "incompleteness or inaccuracy under § 1681s-2(b) requires a showing that the information the data furnisher provided was (1) patently incorrect, or (2) materially misleading, including by omission. By materially misleading, we mean 'misleading in such a way and to such an extent that it can be expected to adversely affect credit decisions.'" That is a good standard for the industry.
This is the third circuit court ruling in the past year that affirmed summary judgment in favor of the furnisher on a reasonable investigation claim – Bibbs v Trans Union from the 3rd Circuit and Milgram v Chase Bank from the 11th Circuit. The Frazier court acknowledged it was consistent with Bibbs. The court noted Bibbs "involves the accuracy of a credit report under 15 U.S.C. § 1681e(b), [but] given our adoption of the patently incorrect or materially misleading standard from § 1681e(b) caselaw, the analogy is tight."
The tide of TCPA cases turned after the Facebook ruling. It also seems like there is a good trend in FCRA cases. Let's hope so.
Read the full July 17, 2023 edition of the AccountsRecovery.net Compliance Digest.
"Appeals Court Upholds Reasonableness of Dispute Investigation in FCRA Case" was published by ARM Compliance Digest on July 17, 2023
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Webinar
Oct 29, 2026
Carol Rooney Presents on Building a Career in Appellate Practice

In The News
Oct 28, 2026
James Ferrara Comments in The New York Times on Stalled Boca Raton Luxury Condo Project

Insights for Insurers Alert
Oct 28, 2026
Insurance and Reinsurance Commutations, Run-Off, and Loss Portfolio Transfers

Healthcare Alert
Oct 27, 2026
Illinois Medical Aid-in-Dying Law Takes Effect Amid Legal Challenges

In The News
Oct 26, 2026
Scott Seaman Examines the Insurance Coverage Implications of a Recent NFL Concussion Ruling

In The News
Oct 23, 2026
Michael Dowell Discusses Potential Impact of Proposition 44 on California Community Clinics

In The News
Oct 21, 2026
Scott Seaman Says Walmart Ruling is an "Aberration" in the Opioid Insurance Battle

Event
October 21 – 23, 2026
D.L. Morriss Presents on International Banking Litigation and AI Regulation





