Craig Liljestrand CDLB Column: Expert Testimony Properly Excluded in Asbestos Case
In The News | 1 min read
Sep 26, 2017
Craig Liljestrand—a Chicago-based partner in the Product Liability practice area at Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP—has published a new Chicago Daily Law Bulletin column titled "Expert's theories deemed shades of the same color, properly excluded." The article examines the Seventh Circuit decision in Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp., et al., No. 15-3112, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16795 (7th Cir. 2017) which held that the "cumulative exposure" theory is the same as the "each and every exposure" theory. Liljestrand analyzes the decision and the Seventh Circuit's application of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., which ultimately lead them to "properly exclude" an expert testimony.
Read "Expert's theories deemed shades of the same color, properly excluded" (PDF)
Read "Expert's theories deemed shades of the same color, properly excluded" on the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin Website (subscription required)
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Press Release
Oct 9, 2026
Adam Topel Appointed Chair-Elect of the ABA’s TIPS Appellate Advocacy Committee

Press Release
Oct 8, 2026
Technology Service Corporation Closes on Acquisition by Blackstone-Backed Purchaser

Employment Law Observer
Oct 8, 2026
“We Didn’t Know” is No Longer an Employer Defense for Religious Accommodation Claims Under Title VII

In The News
Oct 8, 2026
Lucy Wang Analyzes What Insurers Need to Know About Two New California Laws

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Oct 8, 2026
The Rise of Management Service Organizations: How Lawyers and Lawmakers are Responding

In The News
Oct 7, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses Google’s Coverage Battle Over Social Media Addiction Claims

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 6, 2026
Mixed Messages Ongoing as Courts Disagree Whether Texts Constitute “Calls” Under the TCPA






