Anshuman Vaidya Analyzes How a Recent SCOTUS Ruling Limiting Tax Court Jurisdiction Will Affect Taxpayers Seeking to Resolve a Tax Dispute
In The News | 2 min read
Jun 18, 2025
Hinshaw partner Anshuman Vaidya was quoted in a recent Accounting Today article reporting on the U.S. Supreme Court's June 2025 decision in Zuch v. Commissioner. The 8-1 decision limits the U.S. Tax Court's jurisdiction when an IRS tax levy is no longer in effect. The Court held that once the IRS removes a levy, the Tax Court loses authority to hear the taxpayer's challenge, even if underlying tax issues remain unresolved.
Anshuman explained that the decision marks a significant exception to the general rule allowing taxpayers to choose their preferred forum for resolving tax disputes:
"A taxpayer ordinarily gets to choose whether to go to the U.S. Tax Court, a U.S. district court or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to resolve their dispute with the IRS regarding the amount of tax owed. The Tax Court is often a preferred venue for taxpayers, as petitioners may file for relief without having paid the underlying tax first.
However, the Tax Court generally hears cases taking place before the IRS issues a formal assessment. The district court or Court of Federal Claims are typically appropriate after assessment, but a taxpayer would first have to pay the IRS the tax owed and then sue the IRS for a refund in one of those forums."
Anshuman also emphasized that the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion clarifies the IRS's ability to influence where a tax dispute is heard, and cautions that taxpayers should be wary of relying on IRS collection actions to secure Tax Court review of their tax dispute:
"What this opinion makes clear is that if the IRS drops its levy, the Tax Court no longer has jurisdiction over the underlying tax dispute. The taxpayer's only recourse may be to start over and file a suit for refund in the district court or the Court of Federal Claims if the statute of limitations for filing a refund suit has not expired.
Thus, it is the rare instance where the IRS has some control over the forum in which a taxpayer's dispute is actually heard. Taxpayers should therefore be wary of using IRS collection actions as a vehicle to get into the Tax Court to challenge their underlying tax disputes, as the IRS ultimately controls the keys to that vehicle."
- Accounting Today: "SCOTUS limits Tax Court jurisdiction if an IRS tax levy disappears" (June 18, 2025)
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Press Release
Nov 13, 2026
Hinshaw Advises Client Safe Harbor Capital Partners in $44 Million Financing

In The News
Nov 12, 2026
Spencer Kook Authors Article Providing a Claims Manager’s Guide to Class Action Exposure

In The News
Nov 12, 2026
Mitch Chargo Discusses Cannabis M&A Implications in a Post-Rescheduling Landscape

Webinar
Nov 12, 2026
Michael Adams Presents on Navigating Ethics in the Digital Age

Event
Nov 12, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie Discusses AI and Supply Chain Cybersecurity

Healthcare Alert
Nov 11, 2026
Illinois Enacts 340B Contract Pharmacy Protections: 7 Steps Covered Entities Should Take

In The News
Nov 10, 2026
Brian Turetsky Examines How NYC’s Proposed POWER Act Could Expand Private UDAAP Claims

In The News
Nov 9, 2026
Kate Schnake Examines Unlawful Discrimination vs. Legitimate Advocacy in Jury Selection

Press Release
Nov 6, 2026
Hinshaw Recognized by the LCLD as a 2026 Compass Award Winner and Top Performer

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Nov 5, 2026
FDIC Proposes State Bank Preemption Parity Rule Regarding Host State Laws



