Ahmad Mango Weighs the Risks and Rewards of Using Attorney Opinion Letters in Real Estate Deals
In The News | 1 min read
Aug 27, 2024
Hinshaw attorney Ahmad Mango recently authored a Daily Business Review byline discussing the emerging trend of using Attorney Opinion Letters (AOLs) as an alternative to title insurance in real estate finance transactions.
Despite the potential cost savings, Mango warns of the risks involved in forgoing traditional title insurance. Additionally, Mango discusses the Federal Housing Finance Agency's 2022 initiative, which allowed Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to accept AOLs under certain conditions, with the aim of reducing closing costs for low-income and first-time homebuyers.
Mango expressed skepticism regarding the effectiveness and safety of relying on AOLs as a replacement for title insurance. He explains how this is especially concerning given the limited protection offered by AOLs, and provides the stances taken by reputable title underwriters in Florida.
Read the full article (subscription may be required).
Media Coverage
- “Authorizing the Use of Attorney Opinion Letters in Lieu of Title Insurance in Real Estate Transactions” was published by Daily Business Review on August 26, 2024.
- "Approving Attorney Opinion Letters In Lieu of Title Insurance Is Trending, But Use With Caution" was republished by Law Journal Newsletters on September 1, 2024.
Featured Insights

Press Release
Oct 22, 2025
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP Launches New Website and Refreshed Brand

Press Release
Sep 26, 2025
Hinshaw Recognized as a “Leader in Litigation” in the BTI Consulting Litigation Outlook 2026 Survey

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Sep 23, 2025
Fall 2025 Regulatory Roundup: Top U.S. Privacy and AI Developments for Businesses to Track

Press Release
Sep 15, 2025
Hinshaw Achieves 2024–2025 Mansfield Rule Certification Plus Status

In The News
Sep 5, 2025
Jessica Riley Reflects in a Law360 Story on Lessons She Learned as a Junior Lawyer

Press Release
Aug 25, 2025
Trial Spotlight: Hinshaw Prevails in ERISA Fiduciary Fraud Case






