U.S. House Committee Moves Forward Asbestos Bankruptcy Trust Disclosure Law
Hinshaw Alert | 1 min read
Jun 29, 2012
Earlier this month, the U.S. House of Representatives’ Committee on the Judiciary passed the Furthering Asbestos Claims Transparency (FACT) Act of 2012 (H.R. 4369). The Committee vote was 15-14 and occurred on the 17th roll call. The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform fully endorsed the passage of the FACT Act.
The bill would mandate all asbestos bankruptcy trusts in place to report claimant filing information to the bankruptcy courts on a quarterly basis. That filing requirement would include: (1) the claimant’s name and background information, (2) the trusts applied to for payment, and (3) an accounting of trust funds received. The information would also include the claimant’s asbestos-exposure history. The filing information would not include any confidential medical records or the claimant’s social security number.
It has been argued with much supporting evidence that the current asbestos bankruptcy system is not transparent, and that it is secretive in nature and lacks accountability. The new law is specifically aimed at preventing unfair monetary incentives to claimants and their counsel and to prevent inconsistent claims made in the tort system when compared to information being asserted to the bankruptcy trusts. Finally, the new law is designed to make sure that the existing trusts are sufficiently funded to pay legitimate claims while at the same time preventing payment on bogus ones. The FACT Act must now be scheduled for debate and followed by a full vote in the U.S. House of Representatives.
For more information, please contact Craig T. Liljestrand or your regular Hinshaw attorney.
This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies


