State Legislatures Continue Their Attack on Banning the Use of Bisphenol A (BPA) in Baby Bottles and Containers
Hinshaw Alert | 3 min read
Feb 22, 2010
A handful of states, counties and even a major city have already passed laws banning the use of Bisphenol A (BPA) in children’s baby bottles and beverage containers. State legislatures across the country are pursuing similar efforts. The existing and proposed legislation banning BPA certainly has the potential for inviting litigation against the chemical and bottler makers, as well as against the bottle distributors and retailers.
BPA is a chemical used to strengthen and harden plastic. It also serves to prevent corrosion and food contamination on the inside of metal containers. One of the most common uses of BPA is found in the manufacture of baby bottles and baby formula cans. Although the potential health effects from exposure to BPA are still in dispute from a scientific standpoint, proponents of the ban argue that the BPA chemical can have adverse reproductive and developmental effects, especially in newborns and infants, and even at low doses. It is suggested that BPA exposure occurs when the baby bottle is heated in the microwave, hot liquids are poured into the bottle, or when the bottle or container becomes aged, scratched or damaged.
We will continue to monitor any significant developments on this issue as they may occur. To date, the following jurisdictions have banned BPA in children’s bottles and beverage containers:
|
Jurisdiction |
Regulation |
Scope |
Requirement |
Effective Date |
|
Albaby County, NY |
BPA – County Law |
Beverage containers for children under 3-years-old |
Prohibited |
2009 |
|
Schenectady County, NY |
BPA – County Law |
Beverage containers for children under 3-years-old |
Prohibited |
Jan. 1, 2010 |
|
Suffolk County, NY |
BPA – Toxin Free Toddler & Babies Act |
Beverage containers for children under 3-years-old |
Prohibited |
2009 |
|
Chicago, IL |
BPA-Free Kids Ordinance Section 7-28-637 Ch. 7-8, Municipal Code of Chicago |
Containers- Empty bottle or cup to be filled with food or liquid for children under 3-years-old |
Prohibited |
Jan. 31, 2010 |
|
Minnesota |
BPA - Ch. 40 (SF 247, Session 2009-2010) |
Empty bottle or cup to be filled with food or liquid for children under 3-years-old |
Prohibited (Manufacturer & Wholesaler) ----------------- Prohibited (Retailer) |
Jan. 1, 2010
Jan. 1, 2011 |
|
Connecticut |
BPA – Public Act 09-103 (HB 6527) |
Reusable food or beverage container ------------------ Plastic container, jar or can that contains infant formula or baby food ------------------ Sell or distribute existing inventory of infant formula of baby food containers, jars or cans as of Oct. 1, 2011, provided such items were purchased or acquired prior to Oct. 1, 2011 |
Prohibited
Prohibited
Prohibited |
Oct. 1. 2011
Oct. 1, 2011
Oct. 1, 2012 |
In addition, in the past year, legislation has been introduced in 21 states attempting to ban the manufacture, sale and use of BPA in baby bottles and children’s beverage containers.
The following states have seen the most recent legislative activity on BPA:
|
Jurisdiction |
Regulation |
Scope |
Requirement |
Status |
|
Oregon |
Senate Bill 1032 |
Empty bottle or cup to be filled with food or liquid for children under 3-years-old |
Prohibited |
On Feb. 19, 2010, Senate rejected bill by a 15 to 15 vote |
|
Wisconsin |
Senate Bill 271 (attached)* |
Empty bottle or cup to be filled with food or liquid for children 5-years-old and younger |
Prohibited |
On Jan. 26, 2010, Senate unanimously approved bill; effective date if passed: 90th day after publication |
|
Washington |
SSB 6248 (attached)* |
Empty bottle or cup to be filled with food or liquid for children under 3-years-old |
Prohibited |
Bill is expected to be signed by Gov. Christine Gregoire – effective date if passed: July 1, 2011 |
|
Vermont |
H. 551 & S. 247 (An Act Relating to Bisphenol A) (attached)* |
Empty bottle or cup to be filled with food or liquid for children 2-years-old and younger |
Prohibited |
House bill introduced on Jan. 22. 2010; Senate bill introduced on Jan. 5, 2010 – effective date if passed: July 1, 2012 |
*(To view the attached bills from Washington, Wisconsin and Vermont, click on Download PDF)
We anticipate that more states across the country will continue to pass legislation banning the use of BPA in children’s beverage bottles and containers. We also predict the possibility that lawsuits will follow in the future against the chemical and bottle companies involved in BPA production and distribution, especially if the science on the potential health effects becomes more developed and undisputed.
For further information, please contact your regular Hinshaw attorney.
This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

In The News
Aug 24, 2026
David Schultz Reviews a Humorous—But Important—FDCPA Procedural Ruling

Press Release
Aug 20, 2026
115 Hinshaw Lawyers Recognized in 2027 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Ones to Watch®

Press Release
Aug 20, 2026
Hinshaw’s Landmark Tower Client Project Receives 2026 Top Projects Award

Press Release
Aug 19, 2026
Fernando Rivera-Maissonet Elected as HNBA Region II Governor and Board of Governors Member

Employment Law Observer
Aug 17, 2026
Massachusetts’ First Paid Family Medical Leave Act Verdict Yields $4.75 Million Award

Press Release
Aug 13, 2026
Lauren Campisi Recognized as a 2026 BTI Client Service All-Star by BTI Consulting Group

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Aug 13, 2026
How Will Banks Be Impacted by the Proposed Regulation O Amendments?

Press Release
Aug 12, 2026
William Cook Honored With the Distinguished Service Award by the Chicago Bar Association

Webinar
Aug 12, 2026
John Ryan Presents on "Understanding what is Covered Under the TCPA Today"

In The News
Aug 12, 2026
Scott Seaman Analyzes California’s New Pleading Standards for Excess Insurance Policy Claims



