Court Rules Alarm Company Liable for Breach of Contract
Hinshaw Alert | 1 min read
Oct 27, 2010
The Court of Appeals of Ohio, recently issued a decision reinforcing the importance of maintaining broad and precise limitations of liability clauses in alarm services contracts. JLJ v. Rankin & Houser, Inc. 2010 WL 3292179 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). The parties in the case had entered into an agreement for security alarm services using a form contract. A dispute arose over payment, and the alarm company stopped providing monitoring services. The customer sued the company for breach of contract, seeking to recover nine months of pre-paid service, and the fee charge by a new alarm company to take over the monitoring services.
The alarm company argued that the customer was barred from recovering the takeover fee because the service contract included a waiver of consequential damages. More specifically, the alarm company relied upon the last sentence of the limited warranty paragraph, which was in large, bold type, and stated: “Company shall not be liable for any direct, special, exemplary, punitive, incidental or consequential damages.” The court found that the limitation of damages sentence was expressly applicable to a breach of warranty, but not to a breach of contract claim. The sentence did not limit a customer’s ability to recover damages for a breach of contract claim. The court found that the trial court properly allowed plaintiff to recover the takeover charges from the alarm company. Alarm and security companies must ensure all contracts specifically delineate all possible claims and causes of action in the limitation of liability clause.
For more information, please contact Philip R. Kujawa, or your regular Hinshaw attorney.
This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. We would be pleased to provide such legal assistance as you require on this and other subjects.
Related People
Featured Insights

In The News
Aug 24, 2026
David Schultz Reviews a Humorous—But Important—FDCPA Procedural Ruling

Press Release
Aug 20, 2026
115 Hinshaw Lawyers Recognized in 2027 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Ones to Watch®

Press Release
Aug 20, 2026
Hinshaw’s Landmark Tower Client Project Receives 2026 Top Projects Award

Press Release
Aug 19, 2026
Fernando Rivera-Maissonet Elected as HNBA Region II Governor and Board of Governors Member

Employment Law Observer
Aug 17, 2026
Massachusetts’ First Paid Family Medical Leave Act Verdict Yields $4.75 Million Award

Press Release
Aug 13, 2026
Lauren Campisi Recognized as a 2026 BTI Client Service All-Star by BTI Consulting Group

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Aug 13, 2026
How Will Banks Be Impacted by the Proposed Regulation O Amendments?

Press Release
Aug 12, 2026
William Cook Honored With the Distinguished Service Award by the Chicago Bar Association

Webinar
Aug 12, 2026
John Ryan Presents on "Understanding what is Covered Under the TCPA Today"

In The News
Aug 12, 2026
Scott Seaman Analyzes California’s New Pleading Standards for Excess Insurance Policy Claims



