Court Rules Alarm Company Liable for Breach of Contract
Hinshaw Alert | 1 min read
Oct 27, 2010
The Court of Appeals of Ohio, recently issued a decision reinforcing the importance of maintaining broad and precise limitations of liability clauses in alarm services contracts. JLJ v. Rankin & Houser, Inc. 2010 WL 3292179 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). The parties in the case had entered into an agreement for security alarm services using a form contract. A dispute arose over payment, and the alarm company stopped providing monitoring services. The customer sued the company for breach of contract, seeking to recover nine months of pre-paid service, and the fee charge by a new alarm company to take over the monitoring services.
The alarm company argued that the customer was barred from recovering the takeover fee because the service contract included a waiver of consequential damages. More specifically, the alarm company relied upon the last sentence of the limited warranty paragraph, which was in large, bold type, and stated: “Company shall not be liable for any direct, special, exemplary, punitive, incidental or consequential damages.” The court found that the limitation of damages sentence was expressly applicable to a breach of warranty, but not to a breach of contract claim. The sentence did not limit a customer’s ability to recover damages for a breach of contract claim. The court found that the trial court properly allowed plaintiff to recover the takeover charges from the alarm company. Alarm and security companies must ensure all contracts specifically delineate all possible claims and causes of action in the limitation of liability clause.
For more information, please contact Philip R. Kujawa, or your regular Hinshaw attorney.
This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. We would be pleased to provide such legal assistance as you require on this and other subjects.
Related People
Featured Insights

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Webinar
Jul 14, 2026
Scott Seaman Presents on Horizontal vs. Vertical Exhaustion of Insurance

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers




