Significant New Revisions to Consent Requirements Under the Illinois Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act (MHDDCA)
Background
The Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act (MHDDCA) is the primary statute in Illinois governing the confidentiality of mental health and developmental disability records. The law provides strict requirements for when and how such information can be disclosed, including mandates around written consent.
Historically, Section 5 (740 ILCS 110/5) has required that a valid consent to disclose records include not only the individual’s signature but also the signature of a witness who could attest to the signer’s identity. This applied both to consent and to written revocations of consent.
Key Legislative Change
On August 15, 2025, House Bill 3078 was signed into law. It amended Section 5 of the MHDDCA to remove the requirement that consent to the disclosure of mental health and developmental disability records (and revocation of consent) be witnessed.
- Prior language: “The signature shall be witnessed by a person who can attest to the identity of the individual."
- That language has now been stricken from the statute, no longer requiring a witness signature.
Earlier this year, effective January 1, 2025, Senate Bill 3288 was signed into law. It also amended the MHDDCA to remove additional formalities specifically for research-related disclosures, including:
- The requirement of a calendar date of expiration for consent;
- A statement about the individual’s right to inspect records; and
- The witness signature requirement, reinforcing its removal for research contexts.
Practical Requirements Under the Modified Law
- Witness Signature No Longer Required: Entities may now accept signed consent or revocation forms without a witness, easing operational burdens, especially in telehealth and remote care settings.
- Simplified Consent Process: These changes support more flexible and accessible care, reduce delays in obtaining consent, and align Illinois more closely with HIPAA standards and federal research regulations.
- Ongoing Need for Verification Protocols: While a witness is no longer legally required, institutions should consider maintaining internal procedures to verify identity, especially in high-risk or sensitive contexts.
- Form and Policy Updates Required: All consent and revocation forms should be reviewed and updated to remove witness signature lines.
Featured Insights

Webinar
Apr 29, 2026
When a Cyber Breach Hits: Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Compliance

In The News
Apr 28, 2026
Matt Henderson Provides Media Insights as Conflict of Interest Lawsuits Target Law Firms

In The News
Apr 28, 2026
Akeela White Analyzes US House Hearing on Credit Reporting Compliance Reforms

In The News
Apr 24, 2026
Michael Dowell Reviews New PBM Reform Reshaping Pharmacy Reimbursement

Lawyers for the Profession® Alert
Apr 21, 2026
When Does a Client’s Duty to Investigate Begin? Lessons from a Time-Barred Malpractice Case

Press Release
Apr 20, 2026
Tom Kuzmanovic Selected for BizTimes Milwaukee 2026 Notable Leaders in Law

Press Release
Apr 17, 2026
André Sesler Elected to the Board of Trustees of the University of Florida Law Center Association

Hinshaw Alert
Apr 17, 2026
Q&A: How to Submit Your IEEPA Refund Claim as CAPE Portal Launches April 20, 2026

In The News
Apr 14, 2026
Bloomberg Law Recaps Panels Presented at Hinshaw's 25th Anniversary LMRM Conference




