Significant New Revisions to Consent Requirements Under the Illinois Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act (MHDDCA)
Background
The Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act (MHDDCA) is the primary statute in Illinois governing the confidentiality of mental health and developmental disability records. The law provides strict requirements for when and how such information can be disclosed, including mandates around written consent.
Historically, Section 5 (740 ILCS 110/5) has required that a valid consent to disclose records include not only the individual’s signature but also the signature of a witness who could attest to the signer’s identity. This applied both to consent and to written revocations of consent.
Key Legislative Change
On August 15, 2025, House Bill 3078 was signed into law. It amended Section 5 of the MHDDCA to remove the requirement that consent to the disclosure of mental health and developmental disability records (and revocation of consent) be witnessed.
- Prior language: “The signature shall be witnessed by a person who can attest to the identity of the individual."
- That language has now been stricken from the statute, no longer requiring a witness signature.
Earlier this year, effective January 1, 2025, Senate Bill 3288 was signed into law. It also amended the MHDDCA to remove additional formalities specifically for research-related disclosures, including:
- The requirement of a calendar date of expiration for consent;
- A statement about the individual’s right to inspect records; and
- The witness signature requirement, reinforcing its removal for research contexts.
Practical Requirements Under the Modified Law
- Witness Signature No Longer Required: Entities may now accept signed consent or revocation forms without a witness, easing operational burdens, especially in telehealth and remote care settings.
- Simplified Consent Process: These changes support more flexible and accessible care, reduce delays in obtaining consent, and align Illinois more closely with HIPAA standards and federal research regulations.
- Ongoing Need for Verification Protocols: While a witness is no longer legally required, institutions should consider maintaining internal procedures to verify identity, especially in high-risk or sensitive contexts.
- Form and Policy Updates Required: All consent and revocation forms should be reviewed and updated to remove witness signature lines.
Featured Insights

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

