Wisconsin Employers: Do Your Job Postings Run Afoul of the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act’s Prohibition Against Conviction Record Discrimination?
2 min read
Feb 23, 2018
Believe it or not, individuals with criminal convictions can make a business out of trolling online job boards for job postings that express an intent to discriminate against applicants with conviction records—think job postings with “no felonies” as a qualification. Postings of this type run afoul of the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act, which prohibits employers (1) from circulating job ads and applications that express an intent to discriminate against applicants with conviction records and (2) from refusing to hire applicants because of their arrest or conviction record (among other types of discrimination directed at individuals with arrest and conviction records). Postings that violate this prohibition can cost your company a whole lot of headache and money. Penalties range from a cease and desist order to job instatement and backpay if the applicant can show he or she would have been hired but for her conviction.
If you are asking yourself “must my company employ all convicts no matter the crime?” Do not fret. There are exceptions to the rule. The principal exception applies to all types of employers and arises when the conviction is substantially related to the particular job. The exception balances the desire to reintegrate convicted criminals into society with the risk of recidivism. With those goals in mind, the “substantial relationship” test examines the elements of the crime and assesses whether the circumstances of the job would provide a greater than usual opportunity for the individual to re-offend. Whether a conviction is substantially related to the job must be determined on a case-by-case basis. Blanket prohibitions against employing individuals with conviction records, whether stated in a job posting or not, violate the law.
What to do? Employers should review their hiring policies, background check policies, and job postings to ensure they do not contain or signal blanket prohibitions against hiring individuals with convictions or felonies. Phrases like “no felonies,” “no criminal record, and “clean background check” should be deleted from job postings and applications. Hiring policies requiring a case-by-case assessment of applicants with conviction records based on the substantial relationship test should also be adopted. Employers should consider whether background checks are necessary for all new hires, or whether it makes more sense, financially and from a risk perspective, to limit background checks to certain sensitive positions. In all cases, background checks must comply with federal law, including the Title VII and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). They should also be completed after a conditional offer, but before the employee's first day of work. And one final word of caution: using a staffing agency will not insulate your company from liability. So make sure their policies and postings comply with the law as well.
Featured Insights

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Webinar
Jul 14, 2026
Scott Seaman Presents on Horizontal vs. Vertical Exhaustion of Insurance

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Brian McGrath Discusses Far-Reaching Impact of a NY Foreclosure Ruling on Mortgage Industry



