Trend Alert: NLRB Holds Employee Acting Alone Engages in Concerted Activity
1 min read
Aug 4, 2015
The NLRB, and courts interpreting the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA"), consistently have held that to engage in concerted activity protected by Section 7, two or more employees must take action for their mutual aid or protection regarding terms and conditions of employment. Key takeaways: "two or more" and "mutual." But, as the title of this article suggests, even a lone wolf may fall within this definition in certain circumstances.
On July 29, 2015, the NLRB generously expanded the definition of "concerted" when it held a single employee, acting alone and without the consent of his peers, engaged in protected activity. In the suit, 200 East 81st Restaurant Corp., discharged waiter, Marjan Arsovski, claimed his former restaurant employer engaged in wage and hour violations under to the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). The suit was filed as a collective action, which differs from a class action in that class members are not automatically presumed to be included in the class; rather, members must affirmatively "opt in" to the action. Here, Arsovski was the only named plaintiff and there was no credible evidence to suggest he planned or discussed the filing of the complaint with other employees or that other employees were interested in "opting in." Despite this, and despite the fact that the NLRB has no jurisdiction over FLSA claims, the Board held that in filing the complaint, Arsovski was seeking to initiate or induce group action and, therefore, engaged in protected concerted activity.
The Board's opinion suggests that any collective or class action could implicate Section 7 protection. Employers need to be very aware of this potentially significant trend: employers must now consider potential liability under the NLRA even in circumstances where the NLRB has no jurisdiction over the claim at issue and even when a single employee is involved. Hinshaw will be tracking this issue closely to see how the Board continues to develop this area of the law.
Featured Insights

In The News
Oct 23, 2026
Michael Dowell Discusses Potential Impact of Proposition 44 on California Community Clinics

In The News
Oct 21, 2026
Scott Seaman Says Walmart Ruling is an "Aberration" in the Opioid Insurance Battle

Event
October 21 – 23, 2026
D.L. Morriss Presents on International Banking Litigation and AI Regulation

Press Release
Oct 20, 2026
Seasoned Litigator Joins Hinshaw's Aviation and Aerospace Team in Chicago

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 19, 2026
Refile, Repeat: Ohio’s Savings Statute Allows for Unlimited Bites of a Time-Barred Claim

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 16, 2026
Key Takeaways from the 2026 ACVL Conference for the Auto Finance Industry

Press Release
Oct 16, 2026
Nia Binns Re-Appointed Health and Wellness Committee Co-Chair of the BWLA

In The News
Oct 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Explains How Bond Request Spurred AG Settlement in Paramount Merger

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 15, 2026
OCC Releases Debanking Report on Largest Banks; CFPB Announces Follow-On Initiative



