Supreme Court Confirms Standards for ERISA’s Church Plan Exception
In a clear win for religiously-affiliated employers, including hospital systems and educational institutions, a unanimous Supreme Court found that a statutory exception to ERISA’s requirements for “church plans” applies to plans that are maintained by tax-exempt entities affiliated with churches in Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton.
The employee benefit plans at issue provided pension benefits to employees of health systems and hospitals that were affiliated with churches. For decades, the plans relied on the church plan exception to ERISA’s rules contained in Section 4(b)(2) of ERISA. That provision exempts church plans from many of ERISA’s requirements, including minimum funding requirements for pension plans. The IRS, Department of Labor and PBGC had all recognized that such plans met the requirements for church plan status.
Recent litigation had challenged this status quo, claiming that the plans were established by health systems—not churches—and therefore ineligible for the church plan exemption. Several circuit Courts of Appeal had adopted that standard for determining whether a plan was in fact eligible for the exception. The Supreme Court, however, confirmed the church plan status for such plans in its application of the statutory text. The Court’s holding was consistent with 35 years of guidance and hundreds of IRS and Department of Labor rulings on this topic, many of which had been relied upon by sponsors of the plans in structuring their employee benefit programs.
To qualify for the exception, a plan still must be “maintained by an organization . . . the principal purpose . . . of which is the administration or funding of [such] plan . . . for the employees of a church . . . , if such organization is controlled by or associated with a church.” Thus, plan sponsors should ensure that their plans are maintained by an administrative committee or other body whose principal purpose is to administer the plan and which is controlled by or associated with a church. Assuming that standard is met, church plan status should be permitted, thereby exempting the plan from many of ERISA’s strict requirements.
This was a critical decision for many pension plans sponsored by church-affiliated entities, allowing them to avoid hundreds of millions of dollars in funding requirements. It also will help to resolve dozens of class action claims brought by plaintiff-employees who were attacking church plan status of their employer’s plans.
Please contact Tony Antognoli or your regular Hinshaw attorney with any questions regarding the application of this decision.
Featured Insights

Webinar
May 19, 2026
Scott Seaman Speaks on Making Decisions in Difficult Risk Environments

Event
May 7, 2026 - May 9, 2026
Anshuman Vaidya Presents on IRS Criminal Tax Enforcement Priorities at the ABA Tax Meeting

Webinar
Apr 29, 2026
When a Cyber Breach Hits: Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Compliance

In The News
Apr 24, 2026
Michael Dowell Reviews New PBM Reform Reshaping Pharmacy Reimbursement

Lawyers for the Profession® Alert
Apr 21, 2026
When Does a Client’s Duty to Investigate Begin? Lessons from a Time-Barred Malpractice Case

Press Release
Apr 20, 2026
Tom Kuzmanovic Selected for BizTimes Milwaukee 2026 Notable Leaders in Law

Press Release
Apr 17, 2026
André Sesler Elected to the Board of Trustees of the University of Florida Law Center Association

Hinshaw Alert
Apr 17, 2026
Q&A: How to Submit Your IEEPA Refund Claim as CAPE Portal Launches April 20, 2026




