New York is Nearing a Ban on Non-Compete Agreements
2 min read
Jul 13, 2023
On June 20, 2023, the New York State Legislature voted to pass a bill that will ban almost all non-compete agreements. Currently awaiting Governor Kathy Hochul's signature, the bill prohibits an "employer or its agent, or the officer or agent of any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, or other entity" from seeking, requiring, demanding or accepting a non-compete agreement from a covered individual. Additionally, the bill voids "every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind."
The bill, which is set to amend New York Labor Law Section 191(d), defines "non-compete agreement" as "any agreement, or clause contained in any agreement, between an employer and a covered individual that prohibits or restricts such covered individual from obtaining employment, after the conclusion of employment with the employer." A "covered individual" is defined as "any other person who, whether or not employed under a contract of employment, performs work or services for another person on such terms and conditions that they are, in relation to that other person, in a position of economic dependence on, and under an obligation to perform duties for, that other person." The expansive definition of a "covered individual" likely encompasses both employees and independent contractors.
A covered individual can bring a private cause of action within two years of the later of: "(i) when the prohibited non-compete agreement was signed; (ii) when the covered individual learns of prohibited non-compete agreement; (iii) when the employment or contractual relationship is terminated; or (iv) when the employer takes any step to enforce the non-compete agreement." Notably, the bill has a prospective application, meaning it does not apply to previously executed agreements, but rather applies to agreements that are entered into or modified on or after the bill's effective date (i.e., 30 days after the bill is signed by the Governor).
The bill does not prevent an "employer to enter into an agreement that establishes a fixed term of service or prohibits disclosure of trade secrets, disclosure of confidential and proprietary client information, or solicitation of clients of the employer that the covered individual learned about during employment." This exception is contingent upon "that such agreement does not otherwise restrict competition in violation of this section." It should be noted that the bill does not appear to contain an exception for non-compete agreements entered in the sale of business.
Courts have the authority to void any prohibited non-compete agreement and order all appropriate relief, including enjoining an employer's conduct, ordering payment of liquidated damages (not to exceed $10,000), and award lost compensation, damages, and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
Topics
Featured Insights

In The News
Jun 3, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses Wrongful-Death and Survival Actions Handbook on IICLE Podcast

Press Release
Jun 2, 2026
Palma Yanni Honored With 2026 Achievement Award by Mount Holyoke College

In The News
Jun 2, 2026
Jason Rosen Explores the Opportunities and Uncertainties of Florida’s New Series LLC Law

Hinshaw Alert
Jun 1, 2026
SCOTUS Clears Road to Negligent Hiring, Selection Against Freight Brokers

Insights for Employers Alert
May 29, 2026
USCIS Policy Update: New Adjustment of Status Guidance Impacting Employers and Individuals

Press Release
May 28, 2026
Hinshaw Adds Former General Counsel as a Commercial Transactions Partner in Miami

Event
May 27-29, 2026
Steve Puiszis Moderates Discussion on Today's Law Firm Risk Environment

Press Release
May 26, 2026
L.J. Rotman Recognized in the Inaugural Minnesota Lawyer Minnesota Legal 250




