New York Crosses the Finish Line to Ban Inquiries into Applicant Wage History
2 min read
May 9, 2017
On May 4, 2017, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio signed into law, Intro No. 1253-2016, amending the New York City Human Rights Law to restrict an employer’s ability to ask job applicants about their compensation history during the hiring process. The law will take effect on October 31, 2017.
New York City is now the third jurisdiction to ban salary inquires following Philadelphia and Massachusetts.[1]
This bill prohibits employers from inquiring about a prospective employee's wage, benefits, or other compensation history during all stages of the employment process. Further, in the event that an employer is already aware of a prospective employee's salary history, this bill prohibits employers from using that information to determine salary, benefits or other compensation during the hiring process, including the negotiation of a contract.
This bill does not prohibit informing an applicant of the position's proposed or anticipated salary or salary range; nor does "salary history" include any object measure of the applicant's productivity such as revenue, sales, or other production reports. Further, this bill is not violated where:
- federal, state or local law specifically authorizes the disclosure or verification of salary history for employment purposes, or specifically requires knowledge of salary history to determine an employee's compensation;
- the application is for internal transfer or promotion with the applicant's current employer;
- a background check to verify non-salary related information or conduct discloses the applicant's salary history, but said history is not relied upon for purposes of determining the salary, benefits or other compensation for such applicant during the hiring process, including negotiation of a contract; or
- public employee positions for which salary, benefits or other compensation are determined pursuant to procedures established by collective bargaining.
Additionally, where an applicant voluntarily and without prompting, discloses his or her salary history to an employer, the employer may consider salary history in determining salary, benefits and other compensation for such applicant, and may verify such applicant's salary history.
If found in violation of the new amendment to New York City's Human Rights Law, the New York City Commission on Human Rights may impose a civil penalty of up to $125,000 for an unintentional violation, and up to $250,000 for a "willful, wanton or malicious act." Should the individual also choose to bring a civil lawsuit for violations of the law, the full range of relief allocated under the New York City Human Rights Law is available to the individual, including, but not limited to, compensatory damages and attorneys' fees.
The goal of the new bill is to close the wage gap among the genders and break the cycle of gender pay inequity. Reliance on salary histories and prior compensation packages in determining salaries for prospective employees can perpetuate the gender wage gap and continue prejudices previously experienced by women. The bill aims to reduce the likelihood of these continued prejudices.
[1] California law does not ban pay inquiries, but prohibits employers from using pay history to justify disparities in compensation between employees of the opposite sex, different races, and different ethnicities.
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 17, 2026
Massachusetts’ First Paid Family Medical Leave Act Verdict Yields $4.75 Million Award

Press Release
Aug 13, 2026
Lauren Campisi Recognized as a 2026 BTI Client Service All-Star by BTI Consulting Group

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Aug 13, 2026
How Will Banks Be Impacted by the Proposed Regulation O Amendments?

Press Release
Aug 12, 2026
William Cook Honored With the Distinguished Service Award by the Chicago Bar Association

Webinar
Aug 12, 2026
John Ryan Presents on "Understanding what is Covered Under the TCPA Today"

In The News
Aug 12, 2026
Scott Seaman Analyzes California’s New Pleading Standards for Excess Insurance Policy Claims

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards


