Justice Department Extends Title VII Protection to Transgender Government Employees
1 min read
Dec 19, 2014
In a surprising reversal, on December 18, 2014, Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") will now interpret Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII") as extending to protect discrimination claims based on gender identity, including transgender status. Although this is a noteworthy change of position by the Department, the Employment Litigation Section of the DOJ enforces Title VII against state and local governments only, and private employers, therefore,will not be affected by this expansion.
Previously, the DOJ had interpreted Title VII, which prohibits discrimination based on sex, as not covering people who do not present as the gender associated with the sex with which they were born. As Attorney General Holder noted, however, several courts — including the First, Sixth, and 11th Circuit Courts of Appeals — have interpreted Title VII's prohibition of sex discrimination as barring discrimination based on a perceived failure to conform to socially constructed characteristics of males and females. Recognizing that although Congress may not have had such claims in mind when it enacted Title VII, Attorney General Holder determined based on the text of statute, the relevant case law interpreting the statute, and the developing jurisprudence in the area, that the best reading of Title VII's prohibition against sex discrimination is that it encompasses discrimination based on gender identity.
This announcement is an important indicator of the Obama administration's ongoing effort to expand the law's protection of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and other workers.
Topics
Featured Insights

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Webinar
Jul 14, 2026
Scott Seaman Presents on Horizontal vs. Vertical Exhaustion of Insurance

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Brian McGrath Discusses Far-Reaching Impact of a NY Foreclosure Ruling on Mortgage Industry



