Justice Department Extends Title VII Protection to Transgender Government Employees
1 min read
Dec 19, 2014
In a surprising reversal, on December 18, 2014, Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") will now interpret Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII") as extending to protect discrimination claims based on gender identity, including transgender status. Although this is a noteworthy change of position by the Department, the Employment Litigation Section of the DOJ enforces Title VII against state and local governments only, and private employers, therefore,will not be affected by this expansion.
Previously, the DOJ had interpreted Title VII, which prohibits discrimination based on sex, as not covering people who do not present as the gender associated with the sex with which they were born. As Attorney General Holder noted, however, several courts — including the First, Sixth, and 11th Circuit Courts of Appeals — have interpreted Title VII's prohibition of sex discrimination as barring discrimination based on a perceived failure to conform to socially constructed characteristics of males and females. Recognizing that although Congress may not have had such claims in mind when it enacted Title VII, Attorney General Holder determined based on the text of statute, the relevant case law interpreting the statute, and the developing jurisprudence in the area, that the best reading of Title VII's prohibition against sex discrimination is that it encompasses discrimination based on gender identity.
This announcement is an important indicator of the Obama administration's ongoing effort to expand the law's protection of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and other workers.
Topics
Featured Insights

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

