How Employers Can Comply With New York’s Ban on Stay-or-Pay Agreements
Signed into law on December 19, 2025, New York’s Trapped at Work Act (the “Act”) prohibits employers from having workers execute employment promissory notes that require workers to “repay” employers if they leave their job before a specific tenure of employment.
Commonly referred to as “stay-or-pays,” employers previously required workers to execute or otherwise agree to these agreements, provisions, or instruments as a precondition to employment.
Under their terms, if the worker stopped working for the employer before the expiration of a set period of time, the worker would be required to pay the employer a sum of money as compensation for the investment the employer made in the worker’s training and professional development. The Act now renders such provisions unlawful and unenforceable.
Critics of stay-or-pays pushed for passage of the Act, claiming they are antithetical to “at-will” employment by deterring employees from leaving jobs with poor working conditions, seeking professional advancement with other potential employers, and generally restricting worker mobility. The New York Legislature and Governor Hochul agreed, deeming such stay-or-pays “unconscionable, against public policy, and unenforceable.”
Who is Covered: The Act’s Expansive Definition of “Worker”
The Act defines “worker” broadly to include anyone “permitted to work for or on behalf of an employer,” including:
-
- traditional W2 employees;
- independent contractors;
- interns and externs;
- apprentices;
- volunteers;
- individuals who provide services through a business, nonprofit organization, or association; and
- even sole proprietors providing services to an employer or to the employer’s clients/customers.
This expansive definition significantly limits an employer’s ability to rely on stay-or-pays across a wide range of working relationships.
Not All Repayment Obligations are Prohibited or Invalidated
Employers may still precondition employment on the execution of agreements requiring:
-
- repayment of advanced monies unrelated to training (sign-on bonuses),
- workers to pay for equipment, tools, or uniforms sold or leased to the worker,
- educational personnel to comply with the terms of sabbatical leaves granted, or requiring compliance with programs that were collectively bargained.
Key Takeaways for Employers and Human Resources Professionals
The Act fundamentally changes how New York employers may structure repayment obligations. Employers should be aware of the following key points and take appropriate action:
-
- Employers should immediately stop using stay-or-pay provisions and review offer letters, training agreements, and onboarding materials to remove prohibited language.
- Noncompliance with the Act carries significant risk, including Department of Labor penalties ranging from $1,000 to $5,000 per violation, with each affected worker treated as a separate violation.
- Entire agreements are not invalidated: If the stay-or pay is a component of a larger agreement between the worker and the employer, that provision is now invalid, but it does not invalidate the rest of the agreement.
Enforcement
Although the Act does not specify whether it will be retroactively applied to stay-or-pay agreements made before December 19, 2025, it authorizes the Department of Labor to promulgate rules and regulations consistent with the Act, which should provide clarity as to whether employers should attempt to enforce preexisting stay-or-pays.
Until that clarification is published, employers should hold off on enforcement efforts because the Act authorizes employees who successfully defend against such claims to recover their attorney’s fees from the employer.
We are Here to Help
If you are unsure how your company should comply with the Trapped at Work Act or how it affects your future investment in your workforce training, please contact Hinshaw’s Labor & Employment team as soon as possible.
Featured Insights

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Brian McGrath Discusses Far-Reaching Impact of a NY Foreclosure Ruling on Mortgage Industry

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Jason Oliveri Discusses AI Companions in Elder Care and the Risks for LGBTQ+ Residents

Event
June 25-26, 2026
Todd Young Speaks on Importance of Financial Literacy to ESOP Culture

Press Release
Jun 25, 2026
Scott Seaman Appointed to DRI Center for Law and Public Policy’s Social Inflation Task Force




