Florida Supreme Court Holds that State law bars Pregnancy Discrimination
1 min read
Apr 25, 2014
The front desk manager of a residential property became pregnant and, shortly thereafter, believed that her employer began discriminating against her on that basis.
Specifically, the employee claimed that before she went on maternity leave, her employer scrutinized her work and refused to allow her certain workplace flexibilities that were afforded to others, such as changing shifts, working extra shifts, and covering shifts for other employees. Once she returned from maternity leave, the employee claimed that she was further treated differently in that she was not scheduled for any work.
The employee filed suit in state court pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), which prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex. The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action and the intermediate appellate court affirmed, both holding that the prohibition against sex discrimination in the FCRA did not apply to pregnancy claims. The Florida Supreme Court reversed and held that the FCRA bans pregnancy discrimination. The Florida Supreme Court acknowledged it took an act of Congress in 1978 to make pregnancy a protected class under the federal act, but nonetheless found that being pregnant was a natural condition unique to only one sex — women — and was therefore covered by the FCRA's ban on sex discrimination.
Pregnancy discrimination was already illegal under federal law, but employers should take note that this decision opens the door to qualifying plaintiffs to a new state court forum for bringing such a claim.
Featured Insights

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Webinar
Jul 14, 2026
Scott Seaman Presents on Horizontal vs. Vertical Exhaustion of Insurance

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Brian McGrath Discusses Far-Reaching Impact of a NY Foreclosure Ruling on Mortgage Industry



