Employers Need to Go Back to the Drawing Board for Their Wellness Program Incentives
Many employers incorporate wellness programs into their group health plans. Studies indicate that such programs, which can provide incentives to employees to encourage healthy behaviors, are offered by more than half of all employers who sponsor a health plan.
A critical component of a compliant wellness program is that it be offered on a "voluntary" basis to all employees who participate in the group health plan. If an employee does not wish to participate in the wellness program, then he or she may opt out without being punished for that decision (for example, an employer cannot make such individuals ineligible for health plan coverage). This requirement for wellness programs to be voluntary is well-established in statutory law. What is not well-established, however, is at what point an incentive offered under the wellness program is considered to be no longer "voluntary." If the incentive is great enough, then employees may feel compelled to participate, thereby rendering the wellness program not voluntary at all.
In an August 2017 decision, the federal District Court for Washington D.C. determined that a wellness program could not provide an incentive to participants equal to 30% of the cost of coverage under the group health plan. In doing so, it invalidated regulations that had been issued by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which had established the 30% incentive as a permissible incentive. The court stated that the EEOC guidance would be invalidated as of January 1, 2019 if new regulations were not promulgated sooner. The EEOC then revoked its guidance last December, and is expecting to offer new guidance later this year.
These developments have left many employers who sponsor wellness programs with questions as to how their programs should be structured, especially if those programs carry significant incentives. An argument can be made that with the revocation of the EEOC's regulations, the state of the law goes back to 2015, when the proposed EEOC regulations were first issued. However, given the language of the court's opinion invalidating those regulations, employers face the risk that almost any incentive could cause their plans to be considered involuntary.
Until the EEOC issues its revised guidance, employer sponsors of wellness programs should use caution when establishing the incentives under their plan.
Featured Insights

In The News
Aug 24, 2026
David Schultz Reviews a Humorous—But Important—FDCPA Procedural Ruling

Press Release
Aug 20, 2026
115 Hinshaw Lawyers Recognized in 2027 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Ones to Watch®

Press Release
Aug 20, 2026
Hinshaw’s Landmark Tower Client Project Receives 2026 Top Projects Award

Press Release
Aug 19, 2026
Fernando Rivera-Maissonet Elected as HNBA Region II Governor and Board of Governors Member

Employment Law Observer
Aug 17, 2026
Massachusetts’ First Paid Family Medical Leave Act Verdict Yields $4.75 Million Award

Press Release
Aug 13, 2026
Lauren Campisi Recognized as a 2026 BTI Client Service All-Star by BTI Consulting Group

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Aug 13, 2026
How Will Banks Be Impacted by the Proposed Regulation O Amendments?

Press Release
Aug 12, 2026
William Cook Honored With the Distinguished Service Award by the Chicago Bar Association

Webinar
Aug 12, 2026
John Ryan Presents on "Understanding what is Covered Under the TCPA Today"

In The News
Aug 12, 2026
Scott Seaman Analyzes California’s New Pleading Standards for Excess Insurance Policy Claims


