Employers Need to Go Back to the Drawing Board for Their Wellness Program Incentives
Many employers incorporate wellness programs into their group health plans. Studies indicate that such programs, which can provide incentives to employees to encourage healthy behaviors, are offered by more than half of all employers who sponsor a health plan.
A critical component of a compliant wellness program is that it be offered on a "voluntary" basis to all employees who participate in the group health plan. If an employee does not wish to participate in the wellness program, then he or she may opt out without being punished for that decision (for example, an employer cannot make such individuals ineligible for health plan coverage). This requirement for wellness programs to be voluntary is well-established in statutory law. What is not well-established, however, is at what point an incentive offered under the wellness program is considered to be no longer "voluntary." If the incentive is great enough, then employees may feel compelled to participate, thereby rendering the wellness program not voluntary at all.
In an August 2017 decision, the federal District Court for Washington D.C. determined that a wellness program could not provide an incentive to participants equal to 30% of the cost of coverage under the group health plan. In doing so, it invalidated regulations that had been issued by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which had established the 30% incentive as a permissible incentive. The court stated that the EEOC guidance would be invalidated as of January 1, 2019 if new regulations were not promulgated sooner. The EEOC then revoked its guidance last December, and is expecting to offer new guidance later this year.
These developments have left many employers who sponsor wellness programs with questions as to how their programs should be structured, especially if those programs carry significant incentives. An argument can be made that with the revocation of the EEOC's regulations, the state of the law goes back to 2015, when the proposed EEOC regulations were first issued. However, given the language of the court's opinion invalidating those regulations, employers face the risk that almost any incentive could cause their plans to be considered involuntary.
Until the EEOC issues its revised guidance, employer sponsors of wellness programs should use caution when establishing the incentives under their plan.
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 18, 2026
Paris Glazer Named to Chicago Daily Law Bulletin’s 2026 40 Attorneys Under Forty

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 17, 2026
Federal and State Regulators Continue Crackdown on Junk Fees

Press Release
Sep 17, 2026
Defense Verdict Reduces $134 Million Demand to $2 Million in Catastrophic Motorcycle Injury Case

Insights for Insurers Alert
Sep 16, 2026
America 250: The Nation’s Unique Contributions to Insurance Coverage Law and Litigation

In The News
Sep 15, 2026
Lucy Wang Discusses the California Insurance Commissioner’s Role in Protecting Consumers

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee

