EEOC Retains Subpoena Power even after Complainants' Private Lawsuit was Dismissed
1 min read
May 20, 2015
Employers beware: in a shocking decision out of the Eastern District of Wisconsin, a court has allowed the EEOC to engage in a fishing expedition to gather more evidence against a company which had already successfully defeated the employees' claims in district court.
In EEOC v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., Case No. 2:14-mc-00-52 (E.D. Wis. May 1, 2015), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) began an investigation after two African American employees filed charges alleging that Union Pacific had denied them promotions because of their race. During the EEOC investigation, the complainants received a right to sue letter and filed a private lawsuit in federal court. The employers actually prevailed on summary judgment and the case was dismissed.
The end, right?
The EEOC continued to investigate the possibility of class-wide discrimination by issuing a subpoena for additional information, but the employer, not surprisingly, refused to comply. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, found, however, that the EEOC's investigation power does not end when a private lawsuit is filed or concluded. The court recognized that the EEOC has the authority to challenge any discrimination that it discovers while investigating the claims in a charge.
This is another reminder for employers that resolution of a case with an individual plaintiff employee does not always mean the end of the dispute. The EEOC continues to work diligently on its Strategic Enforcement Plan, which, as you might imagine, involves a lot of enforcement, and as this case demonstrates, even a positive outcome in a civil court does not necessarily mean the EEOC's inquiry is over. Upon receipt of an EEOC Notice of Charge or Right to Sue letter, employers should immediately consult with counsel to ensure that the employer's rights are preserved and protected, and that appropriate steps are taken to address any ongoing investigation by the EEOC.
Featured Insights

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

