CDC Issues Guidance That Serological Testing of Employees Violates ADA
1 min read
Jun 24, 2020
As more states are reopening and employees are returning to work, some employers will be considering testing employees for COVID-19 before allowing them to return to the workplace. In a prior post, we wrote about guidance from the EEOC that states that employers may test employees before returning to work as long as the testing complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). We also wrote about the various types of COVID-19 testing available, including serological testing and diagnostic testing. Serological testing looks for the presence of COVID-19 antibodies, while diagnostic testing checks for the presence of the COVID-19 virus itself.
The Center for Disease Control (CDC) has released new guidance that cautions employers against using serological tests on employees. According to the CDC, serological tests can yield false positive test results because they can detect the presence of antibodies for other viruses. Thus, serological tests may not accurately show the presence or absence of a current or prior COVID-19 infection. The CDC also noted that additional data is needed to determine whether serological tests accurately determine an individual's immunity to COVID-19.
The CDC's guidance is important because the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has advised employers who test employees to use testing that is accurate and reliable. In light of the CDC's new guidance, the EEOC updated its own guidance to prohibit employers from using serological testing on employees. Now, the EEOC's guidance states that using serological testing on employees would violate the ADA.
To ensure compliance with the EEOC's guidance, employers should only use diagnostic testing, due to the issues with serological testing outlined by the CDC.
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

