“Ban the Box" Coming to the Big Apple...
2 min read
Jul 19, 2015
On June 29, 2015, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio signed into law an amendment to the New York City Human Rights Law that requires private employers to remove criminal-convictions questions from job applications and defer background inquiries to the point of a conditional job offer. This “Ban the Box” law prohibits NYC employers from making any inquiry or statement concerning an applicant’s arrest or criminal record until after the employer has extended a conditional job offer to the applicant. The law construes the terms “inquires” and “statements” very broadly, and also expressly prohibits searches of publicly available records and many consumer reports.
What does the law require?
Under the law, after an employee is interviewed and is extended a conditional job offer, an employer is allowed to ask about an applicant’s criminal history and to conduct a background check, as is permissible with any other applicant. However, if the employer decides to withdraw the offer afterward, it must give the applicant a written explanation of the decision and to hold the position open for at least seven business days to give the applicant an opportunity to respond. During this period, the applicant has the chance to address any negative or incorrect marks in the record or provide the employer with a proof of rehabilitation.
This law brings private employers in line with the city government’s own policies. As with the other laws, there’s nothing requiring an employer to hire someone despite a criminal history, and it does not apply to jobs where criminal background checks would bar employment, such as law enforcement, certain positions of public trust, and other jobs in which certain convictions could justifiably disqualify an applicant.
How does this impact New York City employers?
However, the law has serious implications for employers. The law’s requirement that an employer extend a conditional offer to an applicant prior to inquiring about the applicant’s criminal or arrest record effectively provides the applicant with a “smoking gun” if the employer decides not to hire the applicant after learning of the applicant’s arrest or criminal record.
Further, any employer who violates the law will also be regarded as having unlawfully discriminated against the applicant on the basis of their criminal record unless the employer can present clear and convincing evidence otherwise. Simply put, if an employer unlawfully inquires into an applicant’s criminal history and does not hire the applicant, the employer will be presumed to have discriminated against that applicant on the basis of the applicant’s criminal history (if there is such a history). In addition, an employer who violates this statute will be liable to an aggrieved person for damages of at least $1,000.
When does the law change?
The new "ban the box" rules go into effect on September 27, 2015.
If you have any questions regarding this law, please contact your regular Hinshaw employment attorney.
Topics
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 18, 2026
Paris Glazer Named to Chicago Daily Law Bulletin’s 2026 40 Attorneys Under Forty

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 17, 2026
Federal and State Regulators Continue Crackdown on Junk Fees

Press Release
Sep 17, 2026
Defense Verdict Reduces $134 Million Demand to $2 Million in Catastrophic Motorcycle Injury Case

Insights for Insurers Alert
Sep 16, 2026
America 250: The Nation’s Unique Contributions to Insurance Coverage Law and Litigation

In The News
Sep 15, 2026
Lucy Wang Discusses the California Insurance Commissioner’s Role in Protecting Consumers

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee

