Amex Employment Arbitration Policy held Unlawful by NLRB
Amex Card Services Company ("Amex") operates a call center in Phoenix, AZ. Amex required all new hires to sign an acknowledgement form acknowledging receipt and understanding of its Arbitration Policy as a condition of employment. The policy mandated final and binding arbitration to resolve all employment-related disputes. The policy also mandated that all claims subject to arbitration be submitted on an individual basis.
Three former Amex employees filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) alleging Amex’s Arbitration Policy and Acknowledgement form violated 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by requiring employees to arbitrate wage and hour claims on an individual basis.
Following D. R. Horton Inc., the NLRB panel found Amex engaged in unfair labor practices by maintaining and enforcing a policy that compelled employees to waive class or collective actions as a condition of employment and that would lead employees to believe the policy bars or restricts them from filing charges with the NLRB or otherwise accessing the NLRB’s processes.
In its analysis of the latter holding, the panel made one tantamount distinction between the policy and acknowledgment form. The policy clearly stated "any claim under the National Labor Relations Act was not covered." However, the form did not. As a result, the NLRB deemed the policy ambiguous when read together. Construing the ambiguity against AMEX, the panel found the policy unlawful because employees would reasonably believe that it interferes with their ability to file a charge or access the NLRB’s processes.
This case highlights the importance of ensuring policies and acknowledgment forms are consistent. It also highlights the importance of updating employment policies to reflect changes in the law. Amex’s policy went into effect sometime in 2003. D.R. Horton was decided in 2012. Had Amex updated its arbitration policy accordingly, it could have avoided the employees’ suit and drafted a valid arbitration policy. Employers should review policies with their attorneys’ yearly.
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee

In The News
Sep 3, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Analyzes FTC Suit over Amazon’s Advertising Pricing Practices

In The News
Sep 2, 2026
Yvonne Ocrant Discusses Horse Business Legal Protection on the EquineRevShare Podcast

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 2, 2026
Two Key Wins for Mortgage Lenders on Illinois Statute of Limitations

Press Release
Sep 2, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Reappointed to CBA's Antitrust & Trade Regulation Section Executive Committee


