National Pharmacy Avoids TCPA Claim for Flu Shot Robocall under Health Care Rule Exemption
2 min read
Jun 2, 2017
A judge in the Southern District of New York recently held that an automated, pre-recorded message sent on behalf of Rite Aid informing recipients to obtain a flu vaccine shot was exempted from the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), by virtue of the FCC’s Health Care Rule exemption. The exemption permits health care providers to contact customers in order to convey important "health care messages" as defined and covered by HIPAA.
The case, Zani v. Rite Aid Headquarters Corp., 14-cv-9701, involved an automated, pre-recorded message sent on behalf of Rite Aid informing recipients to obtain a flu vaccine shot from their local Rite Aid Pharmacy. In 2013, the putative plaintiff went to his local Rite Aid pharmacy and received a flu shot. He provided Rite Aid with his cell phone number and signed a privacy notice consenting to receiving health related communications by Rite Aid. Roughly a year after receiving his flu shot, he received a voice message reminder to get another flu shot at Rite Aid, as did all previous customers who obtained a flu shot and signed the privacy notice.
The case hinged on whether this automated call qualified under the FCC's Health Care Rule exemption. Rite Aid argued that the content of the message qualified for the exemption because the call delivered a "health care" related message. The court held that three factors are considered when analyzing whether a call is a "health care message:" (1) the call is about a health-related product or service, (2) the call is made between a patient and his provider with whom an established health care treatment relationship exists, and (3) the call concerns the individual health care needs of the patient.
The court found the flu shot calls conveyed a 'Health Care' message since they were made only to previous customers and concerned prescription medication and health care needs. Importantly, the court rejected the plaintiff's arguments that the flu shot calls were made with a marketing intent, noting intent was immaterial to the exemption.
Key Takeaway from the Decision
As the healthcare industry continues to expand, the development of the Health Care Rule exemption will likely continue to grow in importance. The most important takeaway from this decision is to consider the context of the message (e.g., is it health related) and the scope of the prior consent given by the customer. A well drafted privacy notice may be the critical difference in the applicability of the Health Care Rule exemption or liability under the TCPA.
Topics
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

