FDCPA Claims Dismissed As a Result of Plaintiff's Bad Faith Bankruptcy Conduct
In Vedernikov v. Atl. Credit & Fin., Inc., (Vedernikov I), the U.S. District Court of New Jersey granted the defendant Midland Funding's motion to dismiss, which successfully argued the plaintiff should be estopped from bringing FDCPA claims that he failed to disclose during a bankruptcy action from which he had been discharged. After Midland Funding filed its motion to dismiss in Vedernikov I, the same Court also issued an Order to Show Cause and ultimately dismissed Vedernikov v. Oliphant Financial, LLC (Vedernikov II), another matter brought by the same plaintiff.
In 2018, plaintiff, Igor Vedernikov, had filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition that identified a single claim under the FDCPA valued at $1,000. However, after filing for bankruptcy, but before the bankruptcy was discharged by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey, Vedernikov filed eight separate FDCPA lawsuits—six of which were resolved by settlement or dismissal, leaving two—Vedernikov I and II—pending before the New Jersey District Court.
Midland's motion to dismiss argued that Vedernikov should be estopped from bringing FDCPA claims that he failed to disclose in his bankruptcy action. Vedernikov responded by asking the court to dismiss Vedernikov I without prejudice to allow him to explore his right to reopen the bankruptcy and then re-open the FDCPA case.
In ruling that Vedernikov was judicially estopped from maintaining Vedernikov I and II, and dismissing both actions with prejudice, the court stated that it, "cannot ignore the perversity of Vedernikov, discharging debt he owed to certain creditors while he was pursing FDCPA claims against the same creditors for their attempts to collect the debt he owed."
Midland was represented in Vedernikov I by Hinshaw attorneys Ellen Silverman and Matthew Corwin.
Topics
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

