Congress Seeks Dodd-Frank Overhaul and Elephant Dart for Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
1 min read
Jun 6, 2017
By: Hinshaw
On May 4, 2017, the House Financial Services Committee passed HR 10, the Financial CHOICE ACT ("FCA") by a 34-26 vote, with all proposed Democratic redlines rejected. The FCA is expected to go to a full House vote as early as this week.
The FCA purports to keep the protections Dodd-Frank aimed to enact, while at the same time freeing regulations on the American economy. It promises to "create hope and opportunity for investors, consumers, and entrepreneurs," by, among other things, ending bailouts and "holding Washington and Wall Street accountable."
FCA, as drafted, would repeal the Dodd-Frank Act in its entirety, remove CFPB supervisory authority over financial institutions, and allow the President to appoint, and remove at will, a CFPB director. Moreover, FCA would remove any authority the CFPB has to investigate actions it deems abusive, but would keep the agency in place, changing its name from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to the Consumer Law Enforcement Agency (CLEA).
Critics of the bill have dubbed it the "Wrong Choice Act," and believe the FCA would return the country back to a pre-2008 environment. Critics have also voiced their fear that the proposed changes to the CFPB could remove its independence and politicize the regulation of the financial industry.
Notwithstanding this, proponents of the FCA argue that reform of the CFPB is long overdue. They assert that the discretionary power given to what they call a "fourth arm" of government by virtue of the CFPB's creation is unconstitutional. This argument tracks claims made in PHH v. CFPB, the high-profile D.C. District case in which PHH Mortgage has challenged the constitutionality of the CFPB (read a recent summary of our coverage of this case).
The 1,212 sections contained in the Bill also affect regulations for the SEC, Department of Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC. We will continue to monitor the status of this bill as it heads out of committee.
Featured Insights

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

