U.S. v. Krane, ___ F.3d ___, 2010 WL 4260978 (9th Cir. 2010)

Brief Summary
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that discovery orders adverse to the attorney-client privilege are immediately appealable when the subject materials are sought from a disinterested third party.

Complete Summary
After two corporate officers were criminally indicted, the government sought to compel production of materials from the former law firm of the officers’ corporation. The corporation intervened, asserting that the materials were protected by the attorney-client privilege. The district court granted the government’s motion to compel. The corporation immediately appealed that order to the Ninth Circuit.

The Ninth Circuit held that it had jurisdiction to consider the appeal and concluded that an interlocutory appeal was not precluded by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 599. In Mohawk Industries, the Supreme Court held that discovery orders adverse to the attorney-client privilege are not immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine, which is one exception to the general rule that only final judgments are appealable.

The Ninth Circuit noted that a common option for immediately appealing discovery orders is to refuse to comply with them and to appeal the resulting contempt order. Building on that, the court noted another exception to the final judgment rule, articulated in Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7 (1918). The Supreme Court held in Perlman that, because a disinterested third party (such as the law firm in this case) likely will produce materials rather than subject itself to a contempt order, a discovery order directed at privileged materials in that third party’s hands is immediately appealable. The Ninth Circuit held that this rule survives the Mohawk Industries decision because the Perlman rule is considered separately from the collateral order doctrine at issue in Mohawk Industries.

Significance of Opinion
This opinion answers a question left open in Mohawk Industries and thereby limits the potential reach of that opinion in the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit recognized the need for immediate appealability in situations where a privilege holder is essentially powerless to otherwise avoid a discovery order when privileged materials are in the possession of a disinterested third party.

This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.

REGISTER NOW for the Tenth Annual Legal Malpractice & Risk Management Conference 

Attend the Tenth Anniversary of the industry's premier event focused on current and important developments in the law and litigation of malpractice claims, legal malpractice insurance and risk management strategies. Each Conference panel examines recent case law and significant developments throughout the last year. One and one-half days will be devoted to legal malpractice (February 16-17), and one and one-half days will be devoted to risk management (February 17-18). The Conference will be held in Chicago at The Westin Chicago River North.

Earn up to 15 hours of CLE credit, including up to 6.50 ethics credit!

Conference Topics

Legal Malpractice Sessions (February 16-17) 

• Settle and Sue: Is Legal Malpractice a Remedy for An Inappropriate Settlement or for the Settlement That Did Not Happen?
• What You Need to Know About Lawyers’ Liability Under the Federal and State Securities Laws
• Establishing a Fiduciary Breach
• Using Pretrial Remedies — Anti-SLAPP Statutes, and Other Evidentiary Early Disposition Motions
• Significant Developments in Litigating Legal Malpractice Claims
• Insurance Law
• Stump the Panel

Legal Malpractice/Risk Management Cross-Over Sessions (February 17)

• The Insurance Marketplace and Considerations
• Who is a “Partner” — The Legal Implications of Titles
• Mitigating or Avoiding the Loss

Risk Management Sessions (February 17-18)

• The General Counsel Forum
• Don’t Ignore the “Basics” — Engagement, Disengagement and End-of-Representation Letters
• The Growing Threats to Client (and Firm) Data — Managing Technology to Meet the Challenges
• High Tech Tools — and Traps — for Mergers and Lateral Hiring
• On the Horizon: Is Susskind Right? Technology and the Future of Large Law Firms

Registration Fees

$1,300 for the Entire Conference — February 16-18
$925 for the Legal Malpractice Sessions Only — February 16-17
$925 for the Risk Management Sessions Only — February 17-18

Discounts (maximum 15% discount per registration)

• Returning registrants receive 5% off the Conference price
• Multiple registrants receive 15% off when two or more colleagues from the same company register for the Conference 

For more information, please visit www.LMRM.com or click here to Register Now!

To speak with the Conference Planner, Katherine McCormack, please call 312-704-3329.