Significant New Revisions to Consent Requirements Under the Illinois Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act (MHDDCA)
Background
The Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act (MHDDCA) is the primary statute in Illinois governing the confidentiality of mental health and developmental disability records. The law provides strict requirements for when and how such information can be disclosed, including mandates around written consent.
Historically, Section 5 (740 ILCS 110/5) has required that a valid consent to disclose records include not only the individual’s signature but also the signature of a witness who could attest to the signer’s identity. This applied both to consent and to written revocations of consent.
Key Legislative Change
On August 15, 2025, House Bill 3078 was signed into law. It amended Section 5 of the MHDDCA to remove the requirement that consent to the disclosure of mental health and developmental disability records (and revocation of consent) be witnessed.
- Prior language: “The signature shall be witnessed by a person who can attest to the identity of the individual."
- That language has now been stricken from the statute, no longer requiring a witness signature.
Earlier this year, effective January 1, 2025, Senate Bill 3288 was signed into law. It also amended the MHDDCA to remove additional formalities specifically for research-related disclosures, including:
- The requirement of a calendar date of expiration for consent;
- A statement about the individual’s right to inspect records; and
- The witness signature requirement, reinforcing its removal for research contexts.
Practical Requirements Under the Modified Law
- Witness Signature No Longer Required: Entities may now accept signed consent or revocation forms without a witness, easing operational burdens, especially in telehealth and remote care settings.
- Simplified Consent Process: These changes support more flexible and accessible care, reduce delays in obtaining consent, and align Illinois more closely with HIPAA standards and federal research regulations.
- Ongoing Need for Verification Protocols: While a witness is no longer legally required, institutions should consider maintaining internal procedures to verify identity, especially in high-risk or sensitive contexts.
- Form and Policy Updates Required: All consent and revocation forms should be reviewed and updated to remove witness signature lines.
Featured Insights

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Brian McGrath Discusses Far-Reaching Impact of a NY Foreclosure Ruling on Mortgage Industry

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Jason Oliveri Discusses AI Companions in Elder Care and the Risks for LGBTQ+ Residents

Event
June 25-26, 2026
Todd Young Speaks on Importance of Financial Literacy to ESOP Culture

Press Release
Jun 25, 2026
Scott Seaman Appointed to DRI Center for Law and Public Policy’s Social Inflation Task Force



