Client Success: Afni Inc. Wins FDCPA Lawsuit Claiming Consumer Confusion Over Collection Letter Listing "Creditor" and "Original Creditor"
Press Release | 1 min read
Nov 12, 2019
Hinshaw client Afni Inc. recently achieved a motion for judgment on the pleadings victory in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) lawsuit filed against it in Indiana federal court. As reported by ACA International, the plaintiff alleged that a dunning letter he received from Afni confused him as to which entity was the one to whom he owed the debt. Hinshaw attorneys Justin Penn and Whitney Goldin represented Afni in the case.
The plaintiff noted that the letter identified three entities (a servicer, the "original creditor", and the "creditor"). He argued that without an explanation about the relationship among the named entities and without an identification using the words "current creditor," the collection letter was confusing and did not clearly identify the entity to whom the debt was owed.
The court looked to the plain language of the letter, and explained:
The only reasonable interpretation of the collection letter is that "the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed"−as required by 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a)(2)−is Affirm Operational Loans III Trust. Although the letter does not use the phrase "current creditor," the letter identifies the original creditor as Cross River Bank and identifies the only other creditor as Affirm Operational Loans III Trust. The "basic logical deduction[] and inference[]" from the letter is that the only other listed creditor is the current creditor….The FDCPA does not require the explicit use of the phrase "current creditor." Afni's debt collection letter contains no internal contradictions or inconsistencies as to the debt owed or the creditor. Furthermore, the collection letter does not use other terms such as "client," "owner," "assignee," or "transferee" that could lead to confusion about the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed.
Accordingly, the court granted Afni's motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Read the full ACA Daily report
The case is Glass v. Afni, Inc., No. 18-cv-03990 (S.D. Ind. 2019)
"Collection Letter Listing both "Creditor" and "Original Creditor" Did Not Violate FDCPA" was published in the ACA Daily, November 1, 2019.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 22, 2026
Vaishali Rao Selected as a Global 2026 INvolve Heroes Role Model

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 22, 2026
Another Court Finds the TCPA Does Not Apply to Texts —Time for Supreme Court Intervention?

Press Release
Sep 22, 2026
Min Kang Appointed to the Washington State Bar Association Board of Governors

In The News
Sep 22, 2026
Spencer Kook Analyzes California's Liability Influence in the National Insurance Market

In The News
Sep 21, 2026
Marisa Roman Cautions Clickwrap Agreements Are Not Enough to Let Companies Off “Scot-Free”

Press Release
Sep 18, 2026
Paris Glazer Named to Chicago Daily Law Bulletin’s 2026 40 Attorneys Under Forty

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 17, 2026
Federal and State Regulators Continue Crackdown on Junk Fees

Press Release
Sep 17, 2026
Defense Verdict Reduces $134 Million Demand to $2 Million in Catastrophic Motorcycle Injury Case

Insights for Insurers Alert
Sep 16, 2026
America 250: The Nation’s Unique Contributions to Insurance Coverage Law and Litigation

In The News
Sep 15, 2026
Lucy Wang Discusses the California Insurance Commissioner’s Role in Protecting Consumers

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

