Steven Puiszis Authors Article on Sequester’s Effect on Federal Judicial System
In The News | 1 min read
Mar 15, 2013
Steven M. Puiszis, a Chicago-based Partner in the Business Litigation Group at Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, authored the article, “The Sequester and the Looming Constitutional Crisis,” which appeared in the March 15, 2013, edition of DRIToday. In the article, Mr. Puiszis discusses the automatic federal government spending cuts — also known as the “sequester” — that recently went into effect as mandated by the Budget Control Act of 2011.
Writes Mr. Puiszis, “The sequester will require the federal judiciary to cut $332 million dollars, or approximately 5% from its operating budget for the current fiscal year. Complicating the problem is that current fiscal year ends on September 30th, and the federal government was already five months into its fiscal year when the sequester went into effect.” He explains that the sequester takes away critical funding for the federal judiciary, which consequently may “hamper [the federal judiciary’s] ability to carry out its constitutionally-assigned functions.” Mr. Puiszis notes that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in his 2012 year-end report observed: “[a] significant and prolonged shortfall in judicial funding would inevitably result in the delay or denial of justice for the people the courts serve.” Mr. Puiszis adds that “[i]n a democracy, justice simply cannot be treated as an expendable luxury in tough economic times.”
Mr. Puiszis is a well-known and highly experienced trial attorney. A large focus of his practice involves civil rights and federal court litigation. He represents clients in class action, commercial and products liability litigation, as well as in professional liability matters. Mr. Puiszis serves on the DRI Board of Directors and chairs DRI’s Judicial Task Force.
Related People
Featured Insights

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”


