Scott Seaman Reviews Why "Insurers Have Won the COVID-19 Coverage War" in Law360
In The News | 2 min read
Jul 23, 2024
Scott Seaman, a Chicago-based partner and co-chair of Hinshaw’s Insurance Services Group, was featured in a Law360 Insurance Authority story about the legal battles over insurance claims related to COVID-19 business losses.
Notwithstanding some pending cases and inconsistent rulings, the overwhelming majority of decisions have favored insurers, leading Seaman to declare that, even though some important battles remain to be fought, "insurers have won the coverage war."
Law360 Insurance Authority Excerpt:
Scott M. Seaman, an insurer-side attorney with Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, said, "insurers have won the coverage war."
They "have prevailed in every U.S. Court of Appeals circuit (except for the D.C. Circuit, which has not ruled)," he added.
Seaman said few new business interruption filings are expected, as contractual limits on bringing such cases have already expired under most first-party policies. Prior to the pandemic, he said, policies often had exclusions for virus or pandemic coverage but noted that "now almost all such policies contain exclusions."
Though there were legislative proposals aimed at providing coverage by fiat or creating a government-backed fund to help out impacted business owners, none of those attempts were successful, Seaman said.
Read the full article (subscription may be required).
- "Curtains Fall Rapidly For COVID-19 Loss Coverage" was published by Law360 Insurance Authority on July 3, 2024.
Seaman added separately that most of the decisions are based on the absence of direct physical loss or damage. According to the University of Penn Law COVID-19 Coverage Litigation Tracker, insurers have prevailed in whole or in part in more than 80 percent of decisions on 237 motions to dismiss in state courts and 96 percent of the motions to dismiss in federal courts.
Insurers have prevailed before state supreme courts in California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Washington, and Wisconsin.
Policyholders have prevailed before the Vermont Supreme Court, with the vast majority of state appellate court decisions siding with insurers. Learn more about COVID-19 coverage litigation in Chapter 22 of Scott Seaman’s and Jason Schulze’s Two Volume Treatise, Allocation of Losses in Complex Insurance Coverage Claims (12th Ed. Thomson Reuters 2024), available here.
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies



