Fred Ufkes Authors Law360 Article on the Inherent Risks in Purchasing Assets of a Predecessor
In The News | 1 min read
Oct 24, 2013
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP partner Frederick J. Ufkes authored an article in Law360 titled "The Inherent Risks in Purchasing Assets of a Predecessor."
The article thoroughly discusses the the California Supreme Court Decisions in the case of Ray v. Alad. Mr. Ufkes offers a thorough analysis of the case as well as recommendations. The article covers various aspects of the case such as the facts of the case as well as the different approaches to litigation the plaintiffs used. Mr. Ufkes goes on to discuss the trial and findings resulting from the trial. Mr. Ufkes further discusses the different lessons learned from the results of the trial which are the questionable usefulness of cross-complaint for idemnity, motions for summary judgment vs. bench trials and how the Ray Product Line Exception has a limited application. The different sections of the article include:
- Factual Predicate
- Litigation History
- Trial
- Finding
- Lessons
- Conclusion
Subscribers can read the full article, "The Inherent Risks In Purchasing Assets of a Predecessor" on Law360.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies


