The 12 Days of California Labor & Employment – Day 7 - "Cannabis use by Employee: Is discipline allowed?"
In the spirit of the season, we are using our annual "12 days of the holidays" blog series to address new California laws and their impact on California employers. On this seventh day of the holidays, my labor and employment attorney gave to me: seven swans a swimming and AB 2188.
The California Fair Employment and Housing ACT (FEHA) protects and safeguards the right and opportunity of all persons to seek, obtain, and hold employment without discrimination, abridgment, or harassment on account of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status. Reproductive decision-making is being added in 2023, as was discussed our Day 5 post earlier this week.

AB 2188 specifically excludes employees engaged in the building and construction trades, as well as applicants and employees in positions that require a federal background investigation or clearance, as specified. This is due to safety concerns, as well as the fact cannabis is still illegal under Federal law.
Generally speaking, the intent of a drug test is to identify employees who may be impaired. While there is consensus that an employee should not arrive at a worksite high or impaired, when most tests are conducted for cannabis, the results only show the presence of the nonpsychoactive cannabis metabolite and have no correlation to impairment on the job. While recreational use of cannabis was legalized in California in 2016, employers are still allowed to require a drug-free workplace as specified in Section 11362.45 of the Health and Safety Code, or any other rights or obligations of an employer specified by federal law or regulation. In addition, AB 2188 does not prohibit an employer from discriminating in hiring, or any term or condition of employment, or otherwise penalize a person based on scientifically valid preemployment drug screening conducted through methods that do not screen for nonpsychoactive cannabis metabolites.
The language of AB 2188 also clarifies that the law in no way, preempts state or federal laws requiring applicants or employees to be tested for controlled substances, including laws and regulations requiring applicants or employees to be tested, or the manner in which they are tested, as a condition of employment, receiving federal funding or federal licensing-related benefits, or entering into a federal contract.
Employers do have some time, as this law does not go into effect until January 1, 2024. As such, employers can evaluate what type of drug testing they currently utilize and research whether they may want to possibly switch to one that does not screen for nonpsychoactive cannabis metabolites. Employers will also want to begin reviewing their workplace drug policy to address whether changes will need to be made. Please note that employers will still be able to discipline employees who possess or use cannabis on the job. AB 2188 does not mean anything goes with cannabis; rather, the bill is designed to prevent people who use cannabis on a recreational basis away from the workplace from being disciplined or terminated for off-duty use.
Topics
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 18, 2026
Paris Glazer Named to Chicago Daily Law Bulletin’s 2026 40 Attorneys Under Forty

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 17, 2026
Federal and State Regulators Continue Crackdown on Junk Fees

Press Release
Sep 17, 2026
Defense Verdict Reduces $134 Million Demand to $2 Million in Catastrophic Motorcycle Injury Case

Insights for Insurers Alert
Sep 16, 2026
America 250: The Nation’s Unique Contributions to Insurance Coverage Law and Litigation

In The News
Sep 15, 2026
Lucy Wang Discusses the California Insurance Commissioner’s Role in Protecting Consumers

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee

